|
This page is graphically intense with long load times due to photos. However, the photos and narratives makes the wait well worthwhile. The opinions expressed are those of the author and in no way represents the opinions of others.
RETURN TO MAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS
![]()
ELECTION 2008 (OCT-NOV)THE POLLSRed and Blue States (Sep 2008) As the 2008 presidential campaign heads into the home stretch to Nov. 4, the electoral map is taking on familiar hues of red and blue, with a handful of tossup states that will decide the outcome. But to the Democrats' advantage, this time around, most of these battleground states are in "red" America, giving Democrat Barack Obama more opportunity to gain states."McCain basically needs every state that Bush got," said Dick Bennett, president of American Research Group, a polling firm based in New Hampshire, noting that Bush won 286 electoral votes in 2004, just 16 more than the 270 needed to win. For McCain, that means defending against serious Obama forays into red states from the Southeast to the Midwest to the Rocky Mountains. Conversely, with the exception of New Hampshire, "there are not that many (Kerry) states where you'd look and say McCain could go into that state and take it away," Bennett said. For McCain, Bennett said, the 2008 race is about holding red America 2004 intact, or folding. ![]() Meanwhile, Obama can play offense. "Right now, Colorado, Virginia, Iowa and New Mexico are four Bush states that Obama looks like he's ahead in, and he's ahead in all the Kerry states but New Hampshire, and he's on the verge of competing in Indiana and North Carolina and Florida," said Nate Silver, a Chicagoan who uses statistical techniques to examine and develop electoral projections at his blog, fivethirtyeight.com, a reference to the total number of electoral votes. Silver rates two Bush states, Ohio and Nevada, as tossups, along with New Hampshire, a state Bush won in 2000 and Kerry in 2004 but where McCain has established a strong personal bond in his two campaigns for the presidency. "McCain is kind of playing for a tie," Silver said. ![]() Sarah Palin Electorate still polarized For a while, the prospect of an Obama-McCain campaign promised to move America past the hard lines and fierce polarization of the past eight years, beyond the screaming matches of cable TV to a post-Karl-Rove-and-Michael-Moore era. The Obama campaign especially dreamed of scrambling the political map, promising a 50-state campaign that would defy the parochial boundaries of red and blue and compete on reliably Republican turf from Mississippi to Montana. ![]() Obama and Biden But that kind of campaign would be the luxury of a clear front-runner, and Obama has never broken away from McCain in what looks to be a solid Democratic year that, Bennett said, has even some Republican operatives scratching their heads about why McCain is doing as well as he is. Any grand ambitions for politics out of the old groove got lost on the gritty road to 270. "In spite of early signs that we might be able to break away from the intense political polarization of the 2000 and 2004 elections, it now appears that we are about as polarized as ever," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. "This doesn't mean the results will be the same, but I've been predicting since the summer that at least 42 states will stay the same color, possibly as many as 45 or 46." A new political climate will have to be the handiwork of a new administration, Sabato said. "It will be up to a new president to try to bring us together," he said. "Feelings about George Bush and other national leaders are running too strong for that change to occur now." ![]() Obama Not Saluting the Flag Historic turnout Indeed, according to Bennett, the driving force behind what he expects to be an enormous national turnout in November, is neither Barack Obama or John McCain. It's George Bush. "People are motivated to vote," said Bennett. "People want a new president." According to the most recent ARG survey, a telephone sample of 1,100 voters conducted Sept. 16 to 19, Bush's approval rating has fallen below 20 percent. "It's not a ho-hum election," Bennett said. It is also a historic one that will result in either the election of the first woman as vice president or the first African-American president, a possibility that seems certain to generate a record turnout among black voters. This seems likely to be true, even in Louisiana, where Obama is not likely to win despite a large black population. In fact, most African-Americans live in states that went for Bush in 2000 and 2004. While Obama holds only a narrow national lead, Silver said that in the wake of the financial crisis he, for the first time, sees at least the possibility of an Obama blowout, something that Silver thought cautious voter reaction to Obama as the first African-American candidate would have precluded. And, Silver said, "If Obama had a really good night, Louisiana is one of those states that he could win." But, he said, "if Obama wins Louisiana, it will be his 380th electoral vote, not his 270th." Tossup states Most of the attention in the remaining weeks will be focused on the 5 percent to 7 percent of the electorate still making up its mind in a handful of swing states. And what are those states? Sabato lists seven tossup states: Nevada, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and New Hampshire. An Associated Press analysis gives Michigan to Obama but adds Florida and Wisconsin. Pollster.com lists 10 tossups: all the Sabato states, except Michigan, which, like the AP, it has leaning to Obama, plus Florida, North Carolina, Indiana and Minnesota. At fivethirtyeight.com, Silver lists only three states that are too close to call if the election were held now: Ohio, Nevada and New Hampshire, and paints the other battleground states in various shades of blue. And, just as serviceable a list of critical states, there are those where former President Clinton has said he will campaign for the Obama-Biden ticket: Florida, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania. The political map of the past decade is the tightest since the 1880s, according to Peter Nardulli, a political scientist at the University of Illinois College of Law. Don't count him out ![]() Obama and Joe the Plumber. Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher became part of the national political lexicon Oct. 15 when Republican presidential candidate John McCain mentioned him frequently during his final debate with Democrat Barack Obama. The 34-year-old from the Toledo suburb of Holland is held out by McCain as an example of an American who would be harmed by Obama's tax proposals. But perhaps for reasons of race, and because McCain has shown more than a dash of daring, the contours of a contest that would look to be a Democratic slam-dunk are not so easy to fathom. "He's been more wily than I might have thought," Nardulli said of McCain. His choice of Palin and his decision to suspend his campaign, albeit briefly, to involve himself in the Washington deliberations around crafting a rescue plan for Wall Street, have come as surprises. And especially with a large white working-class electorate in critical states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan, William Frey, a demographer with the Brookings Institution in Washington, said it would be a mistake to write off the unpredictable McCain. "You never know what he's going to do," Frey said. (Source: The Times-Picayune Jonathan Tilove and Bruce Alpert, The Times-Picayune Sep 27, 2008.) (SITE NOTE: In the last weeks of the campaign, McCain has suffered some notable setbacks as Collin Powell, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his own advisor, Conservative legal scholar and Reagan Solicitor General, Charles Fried came out for Obama. All state that his choice of Palin was part of the reason for switching.) US groups warn of moves to deny Obama victory (Oct 2008) Civil rights and trade union leaders in the United States are warning of last-minute efforts to deny victory to Democratic candidate Barack Obama by preventing thousands of likely pro-Obama voters from casting ballots on November 4. Known as "vote suppression," the tactic involves challenges to eligibility on a variety of grounds, including improper voter registration and insufficient proof of US citizenship or place of residence. "This year has brought of those states, the US television network found that charges of vote fraud or vote suppression "are far more rhetoric than reality." Some voting-rights activists have also warned that the machines used to count ballots at thousands of polling places are vulnerable to "hacking." Computer experts could rig these machines to record inaccurate vote totals, these monitors say. Even if broadly conducted and highly effectively, vote suppression and hacking of voting machines would probably not alter the outcome of this year's presidential election. Nearly all reputable polls show Senator Obama with a substantial lead that may be impossible to erase through such tactics. Still, the Obama campaign plans to deploy armies of attorneys at polling places around the country on November 4 to monitor voting procedures and to initiate urgent legal action in response to complaints of vote suppression. The McCain camp is preparing a similar, though smaller, effort. Millions of names are removed from voter rolls every year in the United States in response to deaths or changes in residency. But other factors may also be involved in some states. And that leads Wendy Weiser, an elections expert at New York University, to describe the culling process as "secret, prone to error and vulnerable to manipulation." "Lots and lots of eligible voters could get knocked off the voter rolls without any notice and, in many cases, without any opportunity to correct if before Election Day." Conversely, Senator McCain's campaign has voiced fears about efforts to inflate voter rolls by adding invalid registrations in neighbourhoods likely to support Senator Obama by wide margins. Senator McCain has pointed in particular to a group that organises in low-income urban communities. It was recently revealed that 30 percent of 1.3 million voter registrations submitted by the group were faulty. (Source: Daily Nation (29 Oct 2008).) Electoral Vote: Road to 270 -- It Ain't Over Till the Fat Lady Sings ![]() (23 October): RealClearPolitics.com shows polls having Obama clearly in lead by 7.8 points — increasing his lead since mid-September. Rasmussen Reports 10/21 - 10/23 Obama +7 Gallup (Traditional)* 10/21 - 10/23 Obama +5 Gallup (Expanded)* 10/21 - 10/23 Obama +7 Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/21 - 10/23 Obama +10 Hotline/FD 10/21 - 10/23 Obama +7 GWU/Battleground 10/19 - 10/23 Obama +3 IBD/TIPP 10/19 - 10/23 Obama +4 CBS News/NY Times 10/19 - 10/22 Obama +13 ABC News/Wash Post 10/19 - 10/22 Obama +11 FOX News 10/20 - 10/21 Obama +9 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 10/17 - 10/20 Obama +10 Associated Press/GfK 10/16 - 10/20 Obama +1 Ipsos/McClatchy 10/16 - 10/20 Obama +8 CNN/Opinion Research 10/17 - 10/19 Obama +5 Pew Research 10/16 - 10/19 Obama +14 (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) A VERY Hostile Interview (23 Oct 2008) Biden so disliked West's line of questioning that the Obama campaign canceled a WFTV interview with Jill Biden, the candidate's wife. "This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election," wrote Laura K. McGinnis, Central Florida communications director for the Obama campaign. McGinnis said the Biden cancellation was "a result of her husband's experience yesterday during the satellite interview with Barbara West." West asked some biting questions of whether Obama was a Socialist based upon his ideas of spreading the wealth around. She asked how Obama had benefitted from ACORN -- but Biden stated that their campaign had NOTHING to do with ACORN. The news director backed up West stating that they were asking hard-ball questions as reporters should. However, Democratic blogs claim that McCain was given "soft-ball" questions so the interview was unfair. VERY Hostile TV Interview with Joe Bidden. (24 October): We have been hearing people proclaiming an Obama landslide — and many polls are also predicting this. But an AP article stated, "Polls are snapshots of highly fluid campaigns. In this case, there is a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points; that means Obama could be ahead by as many as 8 points or down by as many as 6. There are many reasons why polls differ, including methods of estimating likely voters and the wording of questions." Thirty-six percent (36%) of voters have already cast their ballots or plan to vote early this year. That figure includes 37% of Obama supporters and 35% of those for McCain. Forty-nine percent (49%) of African-American voters say they will be voting early. Voters not affiliated with either major party are far less likely to vote early than partisans. Bottomline is that it's still anybody's race down to the wire. However, the odds-on favorite is Obama with an 86 percent likelihood of winning — that is if he doesn't trip over his tongue or some horrendous revelation doesn't comes about. Recent AP and CBS polls are giving rise to feelings amongst McCain supporters that the race is tightening up in the last weeks. Berg has promised the release of the API tapes this weekend — but there is much skepticism. There is also the wait for a ruling for a Summary judgement in the Obama citizenship case — where McCain supporters logically expect a dismissal for lack of standing, but hope fervently for a positive ruling. Die-hard Republicans keep praying for the "October Surprise." Unfortunately, it hasn't happened yet.
(25 October): RealClearPolitics.com shows polls having Obama clearly in lead by 7.6 points -- but down .2 points from 23 Oct. (SITE NOTE: Though RCP states it is 7.6 average -- down from 7.8 -- the graph chart on the site shows an INCREASE in Obama's lead. Interesting.) Rasmussen Reports 10/23 - 10/25 Obama +8 (Up 1 point) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/23 - 10/25 Obama +5 (Same) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/23 - 10/25 Obama +9 (Up 2 points) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/23 - 10/25 Obama +5 (Down 5 points) Hotline/FD 10/23 - 10/25 Obama +8 (Up 1 point) ABC News/Wash Post 10/22 - 10/25 Obama +7 (Down 4 point) IBD/TIPP 10/21 - 10/25 Obama +4 (Same) Newsweek 10/22 - 10/23 Obama +12 (Up 1 point) GWU/Battleground 10/19 - 10/23 Obama +3 (Same) CBS News/NY Times 10/19 - 10/22 Obama +13 (Same) FOX News 10/20 - 10/21 Obama +9 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) (26 October): The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for 26 Oct shows Barack Obama attracting 52% of the vote while John McCain earns 44%. This is the fourth straight day Obama has been at 52%, his highest level of support this season. However, while the overall levels of support have remained stable, voters have become more certain of their intent. Today, the percentage who say they could still change their mind is down to single digits. Forty-eight percent (48%) are now certain they will vote for Obama while 39% say the same about McCain. One month ago, while Obama enjoyed a five-point lead overall, just 41% of voters were certain they would vote for him. At that time, 39% said the same about McCain. As for the Electoral College, Rasmussen Reports data indicates that Obama currently has the edge in every state won by John Kerry four years ago. However, of the states won by George Bush, McCain is trailing in four and five others are considered a toss-up. As a result, Electoral College projections now show Obama leading 260-163. When "leaners" are included, Obama leads 286-174. A total of 270 Electoral Votes are needed to win the White House. (Source: Rasmussen Reports.) RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 7.3 -- down from 7.6 from 25 Oct. Down .5 points in two days. Rasmussen Reports 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +5 (Down 3 points) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +5 (Same) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +10 (Up 1 point) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +5 (Same) Diageo/Hotline 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +8 (---) ABC News/Wash Post 10/23 - 10/26 Obama +7 (Same) IBD/TIPP 10/22 - 10/26 Obama +3 (Down 1 point) Newsweek 10/22 - 10/23 Obama +12 (Same) GWU/Battleground 10/20 - 10/26 Obama +3 (Same) CBS News/NY Times 10/19 - 10/22 Obama +13 (Same) FOX News 10/20 - 10/21 Obama +9 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) Election-Vote.com shows Obama -- 375 / McCaim -- 157 / Ties -- 6 in Electoral College race. (27 October): A new poll on 27 Oct gives Barack Obama a 4.8 percentage point lead over Arizona Sen. John McCain. Obama leads McCain 49.9 percent to 45.1 percent, according to Zogby International, CSPAN and Reuters. Pollster John Zogby notes that the race has tightened from previous surveys giving Obama larger leads and that the contest is close in battlegrounds such as Ohio, Florida and Virginia. The Zogby survey shows McCain leading with white voters and among males while Obama holds the advantage with new, younger voters, Hispanics, Catholics, the working class and lower-income voters. Other recent polls also show Obama with the lead as the White House battle heads into its last week. (Source: Business Journal.) Though there has been a slight upward trend in the polls for McCain, McCain is given only a 5 percent chance of winning as of 27 Oct. Early voting is "through the roof," and that turnout is threatening John McCain even in states that lean his way, including Georgia and North Carolina. Turnout among African-Americans might be "somewhere between 95 and 100 percent in some of these states," upturning some red-leaning southern states. McCain does NOT have the money to advertise as compared to Obama's funds. It appears the Latino vote has turned against McCain -- and some people are saying the McCain group is playing to the "white" vote. The McCain campaign, though facing seemingly impossible odds, has not given up hope and seems to be prepared to fight to the bitter end. There were reports that Palin has "rebelled" against the advice of her Bush advisors causing some comments, but McCain has continued to state that he has the greatest confidence in her. Barack Obama leads John McCain in five of eight crucial battleground states one week before the US presidential election, with Mr McCain ahead in two states and Florida dead even, according to a series of Reuters/Zogby polls released on 27 Oct. Mr Obama's held steady with a 5-point lead over Mr McCain among likely US voters in a separate Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby national tracking poll, the same advantage he held on 26 Oct. The national telephone poll has a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points. Republican McCain is struggling to defend about a dozen states won by President George W. Bush in 2004, including all eight of the states surveyed over the last three days. (Source: Daily Nation.) RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 7.2 -- down from 7.3 from 26 Oct. Down .1 points in one day. Rasmussen Reports 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +5 (Same) Diageo/Hotline 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +8 (---) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +4 (Down 1 point) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +5 (Same) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/24 - 10/26 Obama +10 (Same) Pew Research 10/23 - 10/26 Obama +15 (---) ABC News/Wash Post 10/23 - 10/26 Obama +7 (Same) GWU/Battleground 10/21 - 10/27 Obama +3 (Same) IBD/TIPP 10/22 - 10/26 Obama +3 (Same) Newsweek 10/22 - 10/23 Obama +12 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) (28 October):: Spread narrowing between Obama and McCain. Election-Vote.com shows Obama -- 364 / McCain -- 157 / Ties -- 6 in Electoral College race. This shows a DECREASE in Obama's lead, but McCain remains the same. (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for 28 Oct again shows Barack Obama attracting 51% of the vote nationwide while John McCain earns 46%. (This is a change from 26 Oct where Obama was attracting 52% of the vote while John McCain earned 44%. This is showing McCain gaining.) Battleground state polls released on 27 Oct showed Obama leading in Colorado, Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. With these latest results, Rasmussen Reports has moved Florida from "Toss-Up" to "Leans Democratic." In Missouri and North Carolina, the race remains a toss-up while McCain leads by five in his home state of Arizona. Rasmussen Reports Electoral College projections now show Obama leading 260-163. When "leaners" are included, Obama leads 313-174. (Source: Rasmussen Report.) RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 6.7 -- down from 7.2 on 27 Oct. Down .5 points in one day. Rasmussen Reports 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +5 (Same) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +2 (Down 3 point) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +7 (Down 3 point) Diageo/Hotline 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +8 (Same) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/25 - 10/27 Obama +4 (Same) ABC News/Wash Post 10/24 - 10/27 Obama +7 (Same) Ipsos/McClatchy 10/23 - 10/27 Obama +5 (---) IBD/TIPP 10/23 - 10/27 Obama +4 (Up 1 point) Pew Research 10/23 - 10/26 Obama +15 (Same) GWU/Battleground 10/21 - 10/27 Obama +3 (Same) Newsweek 10/22 - 10/23 Obama +12 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) State Obama McCain Start End Pollster Arizona 41% 49% Oct 18 Oct 27 Northern Arizona U. Arizona 46% 51% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen California 61% 34% Oct 25 Oct 25 Rasmussen Colorado 50% 46% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen Florida 49% 44% Oct 23 Oct 26 Suffolk U. Florida 49% 44% Oct 25 Oct 26 Datamar Florida 51% 47% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen Iowa 52% 42% Oct 23 Oct 24 Marist Coll. Missouri 48% 47% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen Missouri 48% 48% Oct 25 Oct 26 SurveyUSA Mississippi 33% 46% Oct 13 Oct 23 USA Polling Group North Carolina 48% 49% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen New Hampshire 50% 45% Oct 22 Oct 23 Marist Coll. New York 62% 31% Oct 19 Oct 21 Siena Coll. Ohio 49% 45% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen Oregon 49% 41% Oct 18 Oct 27 Northern Arizona U. Oregon 57% 38% Oct 25 Oct 26 SurveyUSA Pennsylvania 50% 41% Oct 20 Oct 26 Temple U. Pennsylvania 53% 40% Oct 22 Oct 26 Siena Coll. Virginia 51% 40% Oct 20 Oct 22 Virg. Commonwealth U. Virginia 51% 47% Oct 26 Oct 26 Rasmussen Virginia 52% 43% Oct 25 Oct 26 SurveyUSA Virginia 52% 44% Oct 22 Oct 25 Washington Post Vermont 57% 36% Oct 22 Oct 24 Research 2000 Washington 55% 34% Oct 18 Oct 26 U. of Washington (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) (29 October):: Republicans losing heart over inevitability of Obama win, but McCain camp still has hope. Others worry about the violence that may ensue this election -- both if Obama wins and if Obama loses. By a 71% to 23% margin, Americans expect that Barack Obama will be elected president in next Tuesday's election, including a 49% to 46% ratio of John McCain's own supporters who say Obama, rather than their own candidate, will win. RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 6.2 -- down from 6.7 on 28 Oct. Down .5 points in one day and 1 point in two days. According to the Rasmussen Reports, Obama attracting 50% of the vote nationwide while John McCain earns 47%. This is the first time McCain has been within three points of Obama in more than a month and the first time his support has topped 46% since September 24. One percent (1%) of voters prefer a third-party option and 2% are undecided. CNN stated that McCain has lost his lead due to the financial crisis in Sept that made undecided voters lean towards Obama -- and they have not swung back. Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +7 (Up 3 points) Rasmussen Reports 10/26 - 10/28 Obama +3 (Down 2 points) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/26 - 10/28 Obama +3 (Down 1 point) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/26 - 10/28 Obama +7 (Same) Diageo/Hotline 10/26 - 10/28 Obama +7 (Down 1 point) ABC News/Wash Post 10/25 - 10/28 Obama +8 (Up 1 point) IBD/TIPP 10/24 - 10/28 Obama +3 (Down 1 point) GWU/Battleground 10/22 - 10/28 Obama +3 (Same) Ipsos/McClatchy 10/23 - 10/27 Obama +5 (Same) Pew Research 10/23 - 10/26 Obama +15 (Same) Results later of 29 Oct: RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 5.9 -- down .2 points from earlier in the day. FOX News 10/28 - 10/29 Obama +3 (Down 6 points from 26 Oct) Rasmussen Reports 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +5 (Up 2 points) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +5 (Up 2 points) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +7 (Same) Diageo/Hotline 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +6 (Down 1 point) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/27 - 10/29 Obama +7 (Same) ABC News/Wash Post 10/26 - 10/29 Obama +8 (Same) CBS News/NY Times 10/25 - 10/29 Obama +11 (Down 2 points from 26 Oct) IBD/TIPP 10/25 - 10/29 Obama +4 (Up 1 point) GWU/Battleground 10/23, 10/26-29 Obama +3 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) Electorate.com showed the Electoral College totals at Obama 364 -- McCain 157 -- Ties 17 early in the day. The "ties" were up from 6 on 28 Oct which is showing a trend towards McCain in the last days of the campaigning but it seems to be look weak unless a miracle happens. THEN later in the day it returned to Obama 375 -- McCain 157 -- Ties 6 showing how volatile this race is -- albeit McCain still lagging. State Obama McCain Start End Pollster Arkansas 44% 54% Oct 27 Oct 27 Rasmussen Arizona 44% 46% Oct 23 Oct 26 Arizona State U. Colorado 50% 41% Oct 22 Oct 26 GfK Roper Colorado 53% 45% Oct 26 Oct 26 Insider Advantage Florida 45% 43% Oct 22 Oct 26 GfK Roper Florida 47% 45% Oct 22 Oct 26 Quinnipiac U. Florida 50% 43% Oct 25 Oct 27 Louisiana Times Georgia 47% 48% Oct 27 Oct 27 Insider Advantage Indiana 45% 47% Oct 23 Oct 24 Howey-Gauge Indiana 48% 47% Oct 23 Oct 25 Research 2000 Louisiana 38% 51% Oct 20 Oct 23 Southeastern La. U. Mississippi 45% 53% Oct 27 Oct 27 Rasmussen Montana 44% 48% Oct 23 Oct 25 Mason-Dixon North Carolina 47% 47% Oct 22 Oct 24 Mason-Dixon North Carolina 48% 46% Oct 22 Oct 26 GfK Roper New Hampshire 50% 39% Oct 23 Oct 25 Mason-Dixon New Hampshire 58% 33% Oct 25 Oct 27 U. of New Hampshire Nevada 50% 40% Oct 26 Oct 26 Suffolk U. Nevada 50% 46% Oct 27 Oct 27 Rasmussen Nevada 52% 40% Oct 23 Oct 26 GfK Roper Ohio 48% 41% Oct 22 Oct 26 GfK Roper Ohio 49% 40% Oct 25 Oct 27 Louisiana Times Ohio 49% 45% Oct 26 Oct 27 SurveyUSA Ohio 51% 42% Oct 22 Oct 26 Quinnipiac U. Pennsylvania 51% 42% Oct 26 Oct 26 Insider Advantage Pennsylvania 52% 40% Oct 22 Oct 26 GfK Roper Pennsylvania 53% 40% Oct 21 Oct 26 Franklin+Marshall Coll. Pennsylvania 53% 41% Oct 22 Oct 26 Quinnipiac U. Pennsylvania 53% 41% Oct 23 Oct 27 Muhlenberg Coll. Pennsylvania 53% 46% Oct 27 Oct 27 Rasmussen Washington 56% 39% Oct 26 Oct 27 SurveyUSA (Source: Electoral-vote.com.)
(30 October):: Obama sank $3 million in a 30-minute infomercial that was well-constructed to appeal to the undecided voters on 30 Oct. Critics felt it was money well spent. Obama infomercial was about comforting white Americans - especially middle and working class white Americans. It played to every point that had registered positive reactions during the campaign/debates. It was a fine-tuned psychological profiling of the voting populace. However, the pool of undecided voters remains as large as one in 10. According to past election results, those voters who decided in the last week of a campaign are unlikely to break decisively for either candidate and dramatically alter the 4 Nov race. As expected, pro-Obama supporters raved about it, while McCain supporters panned it. The success of the infomercial was expected by the Democrats/mainstream media to be seen in the polls within two days. Nielsen reported that more than 33.5 million people watched Democrat Barack Obama's half-hour "infomercial" last night. That's a better audience than the 22.7 million Ross Perot drew for his half-hour ad on ABC, CBS and NBC in 1996, the last time a politician tried this. It's also better than the usual viewership for the networks that ran the Obama ad. Obama's ad aired on CBS, FOX, NBC, Univision, BET, MSNBC, and TV One between 8 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. ET. On an average Wednesday night, Nielsen says, the seven networks draw a combined average of 30.3 million viewers during that half-hour RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama up to 6.5 -- up .6 points from 5.9 on 29 Oct. The slow tightening of the race for McCain widened again but not as dramatically after the Obama infomercial as predicted by the pundits. Rasmussen Reports 10/28 - 10/30 Obama +4 (Down 1 point) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/28 - 10/30 Obama +8 (Up 3 points) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/28 - 10/30 Obama +9 (Up 2 points) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/28 - 10/30 Obama +7 (Same) Diageo/Hotline 10/28 - 10/30 Obama +7 (Up 1 point) Marist 10/29 - 10/29 Obama +7 (---) GWU/Battleground 10/27 - 10/30 Obama +4 (Up 1 point) ABC News/Wash Post 10/27 - 10/30 Obama +9 (Up 1 point) FOX News 10/28 - 10/29 Obama +3 (Same) IBD/TIPP 10/26 - 10/30 Obama +4 (Same) CBS News/NY Times 10/25 - 10/29 Obama +11 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) However, despite the increase in the point spread between Obama and McCain in the polls, Electorate.com showed the Electoral College totals at Obama 364 McCain 171 Ties 3. This was a DOWNWARD trend for BOTH Obama and McCain along with a decrease in tied states. On 29 Oct it was Obama 375 -- McCain 157 -- Ties 6. This shows how volatile this race is. In Arizona, John McCain is only 4 points ahead here, but since it is his home state, he will presumably win it. Barack Obama has small leads in Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia, although the race is definitely tightening as the undecideds finally start paying attention. In the other states, not much has changed. (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) (31 Oct) With just days to go before Election Day, Sen. Barack Obama is warning his supporters that things are going to get unpleasant fast -- and that the race will come down to every last vote. "Don't believe for a second this election is over. Don't think for a minute that power concedes anything. It's gonna get nasty, I'm sure, in the next four days," Obama told a crowd in Columbia, Missouri, on Thursday night. "They will throw everything at us like they've been doing, and we're gonna have to work like our future depends on it in this last week. You know what? Because it does, and every single young person here tonight -- I've gotta have every single one of you voting, and you've gotta grab five more, all of you, have gotta vote," he said. The warning comes after the Illinois senator said in an interview Thursday night that his campaign was winning -- some of the most confident language from Obama since he won the Democratic nomination. "I think we're winning right now," he told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. "Maybe I'm doing something right." And that confidence from Obama may be expanding, despite assurances that the race is going to narrow. On Friday, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe told reporters in a conference call that the campaign is encouraged by results of massive get-out-the-vote efforts in early voting states. Plouffe said the campaign is pleased that a large part of the early vote so far is coming from sporadic and new voters "The dye is being cast even as we speak," he said. Early voting in Colorado, Nevada and Texas ends Friday. North Carolina's early voting ends Saturday, and Florida's ends Sunday. Early voting in Ohio and Indiana -- states where polls show a neck-and-neck race -- ends Monday. The Obama campaign is also looking to expand its electoral map strategy. On Friday, the campaign announced that it was going on the air in Sen. John McCain's home state of Arizona for the first time this cycle. The news comes as a new CNN poll of polls, released Friday morning, finds the Republican nominee leading Obama there by just 4 percentage points, 49 to 45 percent. Six percent of the state's voters said they were unsure about their presidential pick. Plouffe told reporters that the Obama campaign's positive spot, "Something," will hit the airwaves in Arizona. He also said the campaign was going back on the airwaves in Georgia and North Dakota with its negative spot, "Rearview Mirror," which ties McCain to President Bush. Obama plans to campaign this weekend in Colorado, Nevada and Missouri. His running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, plans rallies in Indiana and Ohio. Earlier this week, the McCain campaign and the Republican National Committee launched negative robo-calls in Arizona telling voters that Obama was unready to handle an international crisis. On Thursday, MoveOn.org announced that it was targeting McCain with ad buys in each of the state's major media markets. The Obama campaign also issued a call for volunteers there, citing tightening polls in the state. McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds dismissed the new Obama push Friday morning, calling it a "waste of his resources." McCain, meanwhile, continues to hammer his opponent for exuding confidence in the final days of the campaign. He has been repeating a standard campaign line recently, saying Obama is "measuring the drapes" for the White House. At a campaign rally Friday morning, McCain expressed confidence that the tide was turning in his favor. "I want to tell you the enthusiasm and the momentum that I feel here in Ohio is going to carry us to victory here in Ohio and throughout this country," McCain told supporters in Hanoverton, Ohio. A CNN poll of polls in Ohio calculated Wednesday indicates that Obama has an 8-point lead in the state, with the Illinois senator ahead of McCain 50 percent to 42 percent, with 8 percent unsure. No Republican has ever won the presidency without winning Ohio. And the Republican ticket is wasting no time in reaching out to other battleground state voters. Vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin plans on holding five rallies Saturday in Florida, North Carolina and Virginia -- states where the two campaigns are locked in a close race. On Sunday the Alaska governor will campaign in Ohio, then travel to Iowa. McCain will hold rallies this weekend in Virginia and Pennsylvania -- both states where Obama is leading, according to several recent polls. And just two weeks after his running mate made an appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live," a McCain campaign aide tells CNN that the Republican presidential nominee will appear on the the late-night comedy show Saturday. (Source: CNN.) Early Voting Data Are Starting to Come in Several organizations are collecting data on early voting, which is possible in about 30 states this year. One of them is EVIC at Reed College in Oregon. In North Carolina, almost 1 million Democrats have already voted, but only half a million Republicans. In Georgia, 1.4 million people (25% of the electorate) have already voted, with black turnout especially high (33% have already voted). Data for other states are available on the EVIC Website. George Mason University also has a Website with early voting data. It reports that 20 million people have already voted nationwide. Supposedly one in five voters voted early and Obama leads among early voters 57 percent to 38 percent, a nineteen point advantage. CNN has an interactive map showing the number of early votes and absentee votes already cast. In New Mexico, for example, 194,000 Democrats and 110,000 Republicans have already voted. In another swing state, Nevada, the data are available for only two counties, Clark (Las Vegas) and Washoe (Reno). In these two combined, 202,000 Democrats and 119,00 Republicans have already voted. In Florida, blacks and elderly voters are turning out in droves, but younger voters weren't showing up yet. In the first nine days of voting, 1.4 million votes have been cast in the Sunshine state. About 54% were Democrats and 30% were Republicans even though Democrats comprise 42% of the registered voters and 36% of the registered voters are Republicans. The high Democratic turnout in Florida is not surprising. Obama has been pouring money into the state, with the weekly bill for TV ads running $5 million and 400 paid staff on the ground. (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) President Bush has not campaigned for McCain in this election by joint agreement. White House aides say the administration and the McCain camp jointly decided months ago that the Arizona senator would do his own politicking and that the president's time was best spent helping the Republican Party and House and Senate candidates. According to GOP officials, Bush has appeared at 84 events during the 2008 election cycle, raising more than $147 million. RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama up to 6.8 -- up .3 points from 6.5 on 30 Oct. The Obama margins are widening a little, we also see that many of the states are becoming "statistical tossups" -- meaning that the race is becoming more volatile. Rasmussen Reports 10/29 - 10/31 Obama +5 (Up 1 point) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/29 - 10/31 Obama +10 (Up 2 points) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/29 - 10/31 Obama +10 (Up 1 point) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/29 - 10/31 Obama +5 (Down 2 points) Diageo/Hotline 10/29 - 10/31 Obama +7 (Same) CBS News 10/28 - 10/31 Obama +13 (Up 2 point) ABC News/Wash Post 10/28 - 10/31 Obama +9 (Same) IBD/TIPP 10/27 - 10/31 Obama +5 (Up 1 point) GWU/Battleground 10/27 - 10/30 Obama +4 (Same) Marist 10/29 - 10/29 Obama +7 (Same) FOX News 10/28 - 10/29 Obama +3 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) The Democrats are still predicting a win, but the polls below look very significant. I have used color "red"=McCain and "blue"=Obama. Electorate.com showed the Electoral College totals at Obama 364 McCain 171 Ties 3. However, on the following chart, I used "yellow" if states within 1-2 points difference = a toss up. I used "white" if the difference is within 3-4 points meaning that they are "statistically a toss-up" if considering a 3.5 percent margin of error. THERE IS ONLY ONE YELLOW ON THE POLLS!!! The shift I see is that there are more states that have moved into the "statistically a toss-up" category meaning that the race is tightening. It is still leans significantly towards Obama, but McCain cannot be counted out. The youth vote that Obama had envisioned sweeping the early vote lines did not pan out. Though McCain keeps saying race will not play a role, it is apparent that the massive African-American turnout speaks for itself. State Obama McCain Start End Pollster Arizona 44% 48% Oct 27 Oct 28 Mason-Dixon California 55% 33% Oct 18 Oct 28 Field Poll Colorado 48% 44% Oct 23 Oct 27 Financial Dynamics Colorado 51% 45% Oct 27 Oct 28 Marist Coll. Florida 45% 44% Oct 23 Oct 27 Financial Dynamics Iowa 53% 39% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 Iowa 55% 40% Oct 28 Oct 29 SurveyUSA Indiana 46% 49% Oct 28 Oct 29 Rasmussen Kentucky 43% 55% Oct 29 Oct 29 Rasmussen Louisiana 40% 43% Oct 24 Oct 26 Loyola U. Michigan 50% 38% Oct 26 Oct 28 EPIC-MRA Minnesota 48% 40% Oct 27 Oct 28 Mason-Dixon Montana 46% 50% Oct 29 Oct 29 Rasmussen North Carolina 47% 43% Oct 23 Oct 27 Financial Dynamics North Carolina 50% 48% Oct 29 Oct 29 Rasmussen New Hampshire 53% 40% Oct 27 Oct 29 Suffolk U. New Jersey 53% 35% Oct 23 Oct 29 Fairleigh Dickinson U. Ohio 48% 41% Oct 23 Oct 27 Financial Dynamics Oklahoma 34% 63% Oct 28 Oct 29 SurveyUSA Pennsylvania 47% 43% Oct 27 Oct 28 Mason-Dixon South Carolina 42% 53% Oct 25 Oct 28 Princeton Survey South Carolina 44% 52% Oct 28 Oct 29 SurveyUSA Texas 40% 51% Oct 15 Oct 22 U. of Texas Virginia 48% 44% Oct 23 Oct 27 Financial Dynamics Virginia 51% 47% Oct 26 Oct 27 Marist Coll. Wisconsin 55% 39% Oct 28 Oct 29 SurveyUSA (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) (1 Nov) The story of Obama's step-Aunt Zeituni living in the tenements of Boston Housing Authority broke -- in contrast to Obama living in a $1.6 million home. It was broken by the London Times -- and initially, the mainstream media (i.e., Washington Post) used words like "living quietly" in the BHA to try to downplay the story. The story broke that she was an illegal alien -- who had also illegally contributed $260 to his campaign. This has been a complaint from the beginning that Obama's fund raising was so loose that it allowed foreign entities to donate small sums -- but in enormous quantity. Then the Obama campaign unable to fight the facts started charging that it was "fishy" on the timing. Other Democrats immediately made allegations of a "leak" that surfaced this at this late date. Electorate.com showed the Electoral College totals at Obama 353 McCain 185. No tie states. This indicated that I was right that the race was tightening by the move of many states into the "statistically tossup" category. We see a trend where the polls are starting to shift towards McCain, but Obama still has the lead. Economic concerns are boosting Obama in some usually more-Republican groups; in vote preference he runs evenly with McCain, for example, among white men who cite the economy as the single most important issue in their choice. As a result Obama trails among white men overall by 9 points -- a group John Kerry lost by 25. Even with these advantages for Obama the two are running closely in some customary swing voter groups: among independents, 50-46 percent Obama-McCain; among white Catholics, 48-49 percent; among married women, 48-49 percent. (Source: ABC News.) But the polls are digging up all kinds of miscellaneous facts that mean really nothing to laymen -- who only understand the economy and national security are two key issues. State Obama McCain Start End Pollster Alaska 39% 58% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 Arizona 46% 50% Oct 28 Oct 30 ARG Arizona 47% 48% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 Colorado 52% 45% Oct 28 Oct 30 ARG Georgia 44% 47% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 Georgia 47% 52% Oct 30 Oct 30 Rasmussen Indiana 47% 47% Oct 27 Oct 30 SurveyUSA Kentucky 39% 56% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 Kentucky 42% 51% Oct 27 Oct 29 Mason-Dixon Minnesota 53% 38% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 Missouri 47% 50% Oct 29 Oct 29 Insider Advantage Missouri 48% 48% Oct 28 Oct 30 ARG Mississippi 40% 53% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 Montana 44% 48% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 Montana 46% 49% Oct 28 Oct 30 ARG North Carolina 45% 38% Oct 27 Oct 30 Elon U. North Carolina 47% 45% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 North Carolina 48% 48% Oct 29 Oct 29 Insider Advantage North Dakota 46% 47% Oct 28 Oct 29 Research 2000 New Hampshire 50% 46% Oct 30 Oct 30 Rasmussen New Hampshire 51% 44% Oct 28 Oct 30 Research 2000 New Hampshire 53% 39% Oct 28 Oct 30 U. of New Hampshire New Hampshire 53% 42% Oct 29 Oct 30 SurveyUSA New Hampshire 56% 41% Oct 28 Oct 30 ARG New Jersey 52% 42% Oct 29 Oct 30 SurveyUSA Oregon 55% 39% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 Oregon 57% 38% Oct 29 Oct 30 SurveyUSA Pennsylvania 55% 43% Oct 23 Oct 28 Opinion Research Wisconsin 54% 38% Oct 21 Oct 28 U. of Wisconsin Wyoming 36% 61% Oct 27 Oct 29 Research 2000 (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) (2 Nov) -- RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama down to 6.4 -- down .4 points from 6.8 on 31 Oct. Again we're seeing a downward trend for Obama -- but is it too late for McCain? The illegal alien aunt Zeituni does not appear to be the bombshell that the Republicans had wanted. Though ABC News calls Obama rising to the "highest ever," it is apparent to us that the Obama lead is slipping despite his massive infusion of funds in the last days of the race. CNN/Opinion Research 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +7 ( --- ) Rasmussen Reports 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +5 (Same) Gallup (Traditional)* 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +8 (Down 2 points) Gallup (Expanded)* 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +9 (Down 1 point) Diageo/Hotline 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +5 (Down 2 point) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +6 (Up 1 point) Pew Research 10/29 - 11/01 Obama +6 (Down 9 points from 26 Oct) IBD/TIPP 10/29 - 11/01 Obama +2 (Down 3 points) ABC News/Wash Post 10/29 - 11/01 Obama +11 (Up 2 points) CBS News 10/28 - 10/31 Obama +13 (Same) GWU/Battleground 10/27 - 10/30 Obama +4 (Same) Marist 10/29 - 10/29 Obama +7 (Same) FOX News 10/28 - 10/29 Obama +3 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) (3 Nov) Early Voting Soars --One problem with all this campaigning is that for many voters it is too late. According to the Early Voting Information Center early voting is going to break all records. For example, in North Carolina, 42% of all Democrats, 35% of all Republicans, and 30% of all independents have already voted. In Florida the numbers are 22%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. Here is a summary of early voting at Daily Kos. CNN also has a story on early voting. The latest national polls put Obama ahead by 7.8 points nationally. The Washington Post notes that in the most recent 159 national polls, Obama has led them all. Rasmussen Adjusts Partisan Targets -- As he has been doing every week for several months, Rasmussen adjusted the partisan breakdown for the final week of polling. According to the most recent six weeks of his polling, Rasmussen believes that 39.9% of the voters are Democrats and 33.4% of the voters are Republicans, with 26.7% independent. These numbers are important not only for Rasmussen's polling, but for the election itself as about 80% of the people vote for their party's candidate. This partisan breakdown means that even if the independents split 50-50, Obama has an edge in the popular vote of roughly 3-4%. The last few days, both parties are fighting for the independents, who will decide the election. (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) The Center for the Study of the American Electorate today released its voter registration figures for this election. The increase was moderate -- 2.5% -- but the result is a record. The center, part of American University, projects that 153.1 million of the country's eligible citizens are now registered to vote. That's 73.5% -- better than the previous high of 72.1% in 1964 and the highest since at least 1920, when women were given the right to vote. Center director Curtis Gans says this is the second straight election with a significant registration increase, coming after a 3% boost in 2004. He says as many as 135 million people -- nearly 65% of those eligible -- could turn out to vote. That would be the highest turnout since 1960. Gans projects Democratic registration will be up 1.4% or 2.9 million this year, while GOP registration will be down 1.5 million. The center said that's a small drop but that it declined at all "in this year of intense citizen interest in the election is significant." Twenty-eight states and the District of Columbia have partisan registration. Based on information so far, the center said, Democratic registration went up significantly in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Arizona, New Jersey and Maryland. GOP registration declined in Colorado, Florida and Pennsylvania, but rose in Nevada. (Source: USA Today.) According to the Wall Street Journal, "Sen. Barack Obama enters Election Day with a solid, though narrowing, lead over Sen. John McCain as both men sprint to the finish line of their long presidential race. A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds the Democrat with an eight-percentage-point advantage, down from the 10-point edge he held last week. The Republican was still hoping he could gain further traction in the campaign's closing hours with now-familiar charges that Obama is too liberal and not ready for the job." RealClearPolitics.com poll average is Obama up to 7.3 percent -- up .9 points from 6.4 on 2 Nov. However, some polls grudgingly admit that McCain is gaining ground, though Obama has maintained his lead. Marist 11/02 - 11/02 Obama +9 (Up 2 points) FOX News 11/01 - 11/02 Obama +7 (Up 4 points) NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 11/01 - 11/02 Obama +8 (---) Rasmussen Reports 10/31 - 11/02 Obama +6 (Up 1 point) Gallup 10/31 - 11/02 Obama +11 (Up 3 points) Diageo/Hotline 10/31 - 11/02 Obama +5 (Same) Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby 10/31 - 11/02 Obama +7 (Up 1 point) CBS News 10/31 - 11/02 Obama +9 (Down 4 points) ABC News/Wash Post 10/30 - 11/02 Obama +9 (Down 2 points) IBD/TIPP 10/30 - 11/02 Obama +5 (Up 3 points) Ipsos/McClatchy 10/30 - 11/02 Obama +7 (---) CNN/Opinion Research 10/30 - 11/01 Obama +7 (Same) GWU/Battleground 10/29 - 11/02 Obama +6 (Up 2 points) Pew Research 10/29 - 11/01 Obama +6 (Same) (Source: RealClearPolitics.com.) Electorate.com showed the Electoral College totals still at Obama 353 McCain 185. No tie states. In the national polls, Obama's average lead is now 7.8%, a bit more than yesterday, but not significantly more. State Obama McCain Start End Pollster Arkansas 44% 51% Oct 28 Oct 31 ARG California 60% 36% Oct 29 Oct 31 SurveyUSA Florida 47% 45% Oct 29 Oct 30 Mason-Dixon Florida 47% 47% Oct 29 Oct 30 Datamar Florida 50% 46% Oct 29 Oct 31 ARG Iowa 54% 37% Oct 28 Oct 31 Selzer Indiana 48% 48% Oct 28 Oct 31 ARG Michigan 53% 37% Oct 28 Oct 28 Selzer New Jersey 55% 34% Oct 24 Oct 30 Monmouth U . New Mexico 52% 45% Oct 29 Oct 31 SurveyUSA Ohio 57% 41% Oct 12 Oct 23 Ohio U. Oregon 54% 42% Oct 30 Oct 30 Rasmussen Pennsylvania 51% 45% Oct 29 Oct 31 ARG Pennsylvania 51% 47% Oct 30 Oct 30 Rasmussen Pennsylvania 52% 45% Oct 28 Nov 01 Muhlenberg Coll. South Dakota 44% 53% Oct 30 Oct 30 Rasmussen Utah 32% 57% Oct 24 Oct 30 Dan Jones Virginia 47% 44% Oct 29 Oct 30 Mason-Dixon Washington 51% 39% Oct 27 Oct 31 U. of Washington Wisconsin 52% 42% Oct 21 Oct 28 U. of Wisconsin ![]() (Source: Electoral-vote.com.) Side Issues Hidden in the Smoke: An earlier investigation launched by the state Legislature concluded Palin violated state ethics law by trying to get Wooten fired. The law bars public officials from pursuing personal interest through official action. Alaska's Personnel Board concluded Monday that Gov. Sarah Palin did not violate ethics law by trying to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from the state police, contradicting an earlier investigation's findings. "There is no probable cause to believe that the governor, or any other state official, violated the Alaska Executive Ethics Act in connection with these matters," Timothy Petumenos, the Anchorage lawyer hired to conduct the investigation, wrote in his final report. However, the Democratic attacks over "Troopergate" had already done its damage. Democrats continued on with her lack of experience when coupled with McCain's age. Palin is either one you hate or you love. Palin finally released her health records from her family doctor of her home town -- who gave her a clean bill of health. Her last checkup was during the birth of her last child Trig. Democrats chided her, but no one mentioned that Obama had a checkup in Jan 2007, but he has never produced his medical records. The unexpected wave of millions of early voters casting ballots for Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama may prompt Congress to mandate some form of early voting nationwide for future elections, experts say. So far, more than 24.4 million voters have cast ballots in states where early voting is allowed, providing convenience for voters and, in theory, rescuing poll workers from an overwhelming turnout on Tuesday. This historic election is expected to fuel congressional support for a law that allows voters to cast early ballots without providing an excuse, said the director of the nonpartisan Early Voting Institute, professor Paul Gronke. As of Monday, more registered Democrats than Republicans had cast ballots in the 26 early voting states where election statistics are available. Of 7.5 million voters who are registered by party in nine reporting states, Democratic voters outnumber GOP voters 57.3 percent to 42.7 percent. Because these are statistics and not results, it's unknown which candidates the voters supported. Voters who register with political parties don't always vote for their party's candidates. The popularity of early voting has increased consistently since 2000, when early votes represented 16 percent of the ballots cast. The percentage increased to 22 percent in 2004. This year, experts predict as much as 33 percent of the nation's electorate will have voted early. But massive turnout has also put a strain on election officials -- forcing some counties to extend voting hours to make up for voting machine glitches or to accommodate thousands of unexpected voters, some of whom were forced to wait in line for three or more hours before they could cast their votes. The death of Obama's grandmother on 3 Nov may soften people's feelings towards Obama, but it is doubtful that the fact of the death will impact the election. People's minds are generally made up by this point and this fact is a distraction -- though a personal loss to Obama. McCain handled the death "graciously" with his comments so there was no political fallout. A judge in Virginia refused on 3 Nov to extend poll hours or add voting machines to black precincts in some areas. The NAACP, in a federal lawsuit, demanded those changes, saying minority neighborhoods would experience overwhelming turnout and there weren't enough electronic machines. However, the judge did say that anyone who is standing in line at 7 p.m., when the polls are scheduled to close, can vote, regardless of how long the lines are. The request by John McCain group (and supported by the Obama side) seeks to allow absentee ballots from military members an extra ten days to arrive (14 Nov) because some localities did not send out the ballots on time. It has been taken under advisement. (4 Nov: Election Day) : The campaign is over. McCain would do some campaigning to the last ending up in Florida on 3 Nov -- and will forgo his tradition of going to a movie on election day. Obama finished up in Virginia on 3 Nov and will be shooting hoops on election day. We believe -- well...more like hope -- that there are a big chunk of missing Republican voters in the polls. They did not show up in the early voting. We suspect that there will be a mass showing of Republicans especially amongst the elderly who don't trust Obama's share the wealth (meaning their fixed annuities). The Democrats are counting on a poor showing, however, following the traditional voting patterns of registered Republicans in the past. What we believe is that this is a historic election -- with a lot of heated emotions involved. For this reason, many will vote that have not paid much attention in the past. What this means is that old registered Republican voters -- the missing numbers -- will turn out this time. However, we have to be realistic. Voter registration numbers are up 7.3 percent from the last presidential election. Democrats saw their registration numbers increase by 12.2 percent, while Republicans saw their ranks grow by only 1.7 percent, according to a recent analysis by The Associated Press. Republicans are being handicapped. Promotes the "fear" factor over Obama association with terrorists and blaming Democrats for Economy failure The reason we believe that Republicans will show up is that the "fear factor" of Obama will have convinced many of the highly conservative elderly who normally miss the polls to turn out in force. If such a thing happens, the polls would all be proven wrong. The Democrats are so vocal of their "ground game" but the Republicans are not talking at all. However, the Republicans 72-hour program to get out and vote are not so vocal -- but the Republicans are self-assured that they will succeed in their "ground game." We have watched the swing states moving closer to McCain -- though the mainstream media has not mentioned this fact. We have watched in the past week the tightening of the race as undecideds have made up their minds. Though the polls state that Obama has an equal advantage at the polls, we believe that many will switch and vote for the PARTY instead of John McCain -- much as we did. The reason is that the fears of a "runaway train" Democratic President and House/Senate may be more of a danger than anything else. Many people are voting for McCain simply to prevent such a dangerous condition. It is still within the realm of possibility for John McCain to pull off an upset. McCain in the swing states is within winning distance -- and he's not giving up. The election campaigns continued until the last day. The emotions are running high as electorates claim they are "scared" of McCain and Obama -- along ideological lines. Race is playing a role among blacks, but not considered a role in non-whites. African-Americans are reported to be anxiously optimistic of Obama's win. "Mr. Obama, the first black major party presidential nominee, trails among whites by less than Democratic nominees normally do," John Harwood writes in The New York Times. "Whatever the cause, when combined with his two-to-one edge among Hispanics and his 10-to-1 edge among blacks, it has given him a national election-eve lead." Given the stats, it was really this simple: If McCain stood a realistic chance, all the numbers and the smart folks have to be systematically and completely wrong -- or needed to be made wrong inside of 24 hours. The polls gave Obama a staggering lead even though McCain showed a slight edging up in the final weeks. Though independents looked to be the key in this election, the polls seemed to indicate that about 30 percent of them were voting equally for McCain and Obama thus cancelling out any advantage. In the final stretch, Obama was playing up McCain's age and Palin's inexperience -- while McCain was playing up Obama's inexperience in foreign policy and economic issues. Along ideological lines, you either hate Palin or love her. To Republicans, "She has star power. . . . The base identifies with her. That's the harmony. The melody is that she has a gift -- star power." The turnout is expected to reach record numbers -- with many forgoing work to vote. Some state that McCain may receive more votes than Bush in 2004 and still lose this election. There were concerns that the expected Democratic blowout may push Democrats in the Senate to the critical 60 seat (filibuster-proof) level and create a "runaway train" situation where a Democratic President and Congress can literally do as they please. Democrats have the opportunity to do something no party has done since the Great Depression: Pick up more than 25 House seats in back-to-back elections. Democrats gained thirty seats in the last cycle. This time Democrats are predicting they'll pick up 20 to 25 seats. The Cook Political Report lists 58 House races as competitive, of those 47 are vulnerable Republican seats; only 11 are now held by Democrats. Election officials are expecting an unprecedented, record turnout, but worry is building over all the possible problems that could erupt on voting day. Accounts of long lines, complaints of poorly managed polling places and scattered reports of malfunctioning voting machines could all create problems on Super Tuesday. According to Electorate.com, "despite millions of people voting early, problems are still expected at polling places around the country according to voting experts. Many voters and poll workers will be using equipment they are not familiar with, lines will be long, ballots may be in short supply, and many people will have short fuses due to the expected difficulties. Thousands of lawyers are ready to sue at the drop of a ballot. Somehow, it would seem that the richest country in the history of the world could do better than this." What To Watch For On Election Night: Jeff Greenfield provides An Hour-By-Hour Guide to the Key Election Results. We are posting this prediction of the 4 Nov race by Jeff Greenfield of CBS News here to give some comparison of what is expected and what really unfolds. (Conversion: NY 7 p.m /4 Nov = Seoul is 9 a.m./ 5 Nov.) During Election Night refer to FOX News Interactive Election Tracking Map for electoral vote count. Refer to FOX News election tracker for state vote counts.
Final Electoral Vote: Obama 349 -- McCain 163 (538 total electoral votes: Missouri (11) (McCain) and North Carolina (15) (Obama) not final) Popular vote: Obama: 52% (62,450,831) -- McCain: 47% (55,393,549) ![]() Candidates (3 Nov 2008) Promotes the "fear" factor over Obama association with terrorists and blaming Democrats for Economy failure
![]()
![]() Election Day Voting On Election Day we tracked the election on CNN -- hoping for a miracle that never developed. Go to Barack Obama for Polls and hourly breakdown of the vote -- along with other articles that question Obama's fitness for office. He will have our support as President of the United States. But we will also be watching him like a hawk over his many promises. We love his message of "WE THE AMERICANS" and together "we can" make changes. We will join in his vision -- but still keep a watchful eye that he isn't simply another politician like Bill Clinton -- full of eloquence and hot air. Electoral-vote.com, a definitely liberal source, said: What a night. Something for (almost) everyone. For Barack Obama and Joe Biden their long journey ends. Obama will go to the White House as the first black President in history but more the second coming of Jack Kennedy than the second coming of Jesse Jackson. Although Obama won't outsource running the country to him, Joe Biden will surely have a major role advising the new wet-behind-the-ears President. With two wars, an economy in shambles, crumbling infrastructure, and a raging culture war barely subsiding, the two of them will have their hands full. On the positive side, Obama got a real mandate. Assuming he wins North Carolina, where he currently leads by 12,000 votes, he will get at least 364 electoral votes, almost equaling the 379 EVs Bill Clinton got in 1996. His strategy of fighting in red states is also vindicated, as he took Virginia, the capital of the Confederacy, which hasn't voted for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964, as well as the Bush states of Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Florida, probably North Carolina and possibly Missouri. He also gets expanded Democratic majorities in both the Senate and House. Of course, now he has to govern and you can't do that by asking a million people on the Internet each to submit one small idea. (Actually you can, but then you get a million small ideas and you still have to govern. ![]()
![]()
POST-ELECTION: Obama stiffs Chicago for $1.74M for Victory Party BIll (Feb 2009)When Barack Obama won the presidential election, the DNC and the Obama campaign staged a massive party in Chicago’s Grant Park. They wanted to emphasize that Hope and Change had finally come to America. Instead, it looks as though they showed how they planned to deal with the mortgage crisis — by letting the bill go unpaid after the big party (via Michelle Malkin):Chicago has yet to recoup the $1.74 million cost of President Obama’s victory celebration in Grant Park — despite a burgeoning $50.5 million budget shortfall that threatens more layoffs and union concessions.This wasn’t the Hope and Change Mayor Daley promised: In late October, Mayor Daley assured that the cash-flush Obama campaign would reimburse the city for every penny spent on the rally. “We have a financial crisis,” he said at the time. “The City of Chicago could not afford $2 million on this because we’re gonna be laying off people, cutting back. That [cost] would really be unfortunate. . . . It’s a huge cost to the City of Chicago.Maybe it was the Sub-Prime Campaign? It sounds a lot like Obama’s economic policies. Spend the money now, and simply default when the bills come due. How is this any different from Porkulus, or from Obama’s plan to have the government force banks to write off parts of mortgages by having judges set interest rates? All of this gives the same message: spend it now, promise to pay it back, and then walk away. It’s Deadbeatonomics, which is the simplest way to describe Obama’s entire economic approach. (Source: Hot Air.) (SITE NOTE: What I see is that same tactics of Obama throughout his political career. It is the NOW that is important and then he moves on leaving behind whatever -- simply because he knows that people won't care about old news. Also his Machiavellian style matches this item. Only when someone screams -- meaning the people of Chicago which won't happen soon -- will he pay up the tab. Someone still has to explain where the monies from his war chest has gone. This is one bill that should have been settled long ago.) EPILOGUE Answer to Obama-style Fund Raising: The Supreme Court Gets Ready To Turn on the Corporate Fundraising Spigot (Jun 2009) The case about the anti-Hillary ad got pushed back till September—and got bigger. If Republicans were wondering how their 2012 presidential candidate is going to compete against President Obama's $600 million fundraising juggernaut, the Supreme Court seems poised to provide an answer: unlimited corporate spending supporting the Republican candidate, or attacking Obama. In a Supreme Court term that has had its share of surprises, the court saved one of the biggest for last. Rather than publish an opinion at the end of the term as expected in an obscure campaign finance case, Citizens United v. FEC, the court issued a rare order for reargument of the case in September (before the usual start of the term). At that point, the court will consider whether to overrule its two previous decisions that in 1990 and 2003 upheld limits on corporate spending in federal elections. Given the dynamics of the court, there is a great chance the justices will use the opportunity to overrule limits on how much money corporations can spend supporting candidates—whether or not Judge Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed in time to hear the case in September. In the Voting Rights Act case the court considered last week, the court ducked the constitutional question in favor of narrow statutory interpretation. In contrast, in Citizens United, the court is likely to address the constitutional questions head-on, and the outcome likely will not be good for supporters of reasonable campaign-finance regulation. First, a bit of background: Citizens United produced an anti-Hillary Clinton documentary. The group wanted to air the documentary during the 2008 presidential primary season through a cable television "video on demand" service and to advertise for it on television. In exchange for a $1.2 million fee, a cable television operator consortium would have made the documentary available to cable subscribers to download free "on demand," as part of an "Election '08" series. Citizens United is an ideological group (like the NRA or Planned Parenthood), but it takes for-profit corporate funding. The McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law passed in 2002 bars certain corporate-funded television broadcasts, such as this documentary, in the period before an election. And the law requires disclosure by the funders of election-related broadcast advertising, such as these ads. Citizens United argued against the corporate-spending ban. (It also attacked the disclosure provisions, but they're probably not really in trouble.) Citizens United made a series of alternate arguments as well, from narrow statutory ones to the broad argument that the court should overrule its 1990 case Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld limits on corporate spending in candidate elections. Before argument, I expected the court to decide this case narrowly, by reading McCain-Feingold's statutory rules barring corporate-funded television broadcasts as not applying to video-on-demand broadcasts. That would be in line with the Roberts court: The chief justice has tended to prefer a chipping away at existing precedent rather than dramatic decisions to move the law in his direction. But, as Dahlia Lithwick explained, at oral argument the government's lawyer got into some trouble in suggesting that the government would have the constitutional power to ban corporate-published books just before the election. That made it seem like the court could well be poised to overrule Austin. Though three Justices (Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas) have voted repeatedly for Austin to be overruled, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito thus far have moved more cautiously. In each of the campaign-finance cases decided by the Roberts court, these justices have sided with those challenging the law, but in an incremental way. If Roberts or Alito were ready to go the narrow route again in Citizens United, however, there would have been no reason to set the case for reargument explicitly asking the parties to brief the constitutional question, and certainly no reason to rush the case to September so it can be decided before the 2010 election season goes into full swing. And there's a tantalizing hint of where the court will go in another obscure campaign-finance case decided last year, FEC v. Davis. That case involved a different provision of McCain-Feingold, one involving raising contribution limits for candidates facing wealthy opponents. Justice Alito used the case to attack the underlying reasoning of Austin, which upheld the spending limits on grounds that corporate wealth "distorts" the political process and allows spending by corporations "disproportionate" to the views of those in society. In Davis, Justice Alito, for the five conservatives on the court, attacked this equality rationale and said it is "dangerous business" for Congress to try to influence voter choices through "leveling" electoral opportunities. He pointedly cited with approval Justice Kennedy's Austin dissent. If Roberts and Justice Alito were ready to overrule Austin, why not do it now? I can think of two possible reasons. They may not have wanted to take the plunge on Justice Souter's last day on the court. He has been an ardent defender of these laws. Perhaps more to the point, Justice Alito, in two campaign-finance cases, has said that he would not consider revisiting old campaign-finance precedent until the issue was squarely before the court and briefed. In other words, Alito wants a full airing of the issues before taking such a momentous step. Now he will get that. And then what? If after reargument in September, corporate limits fall—and limits on the money labor unions can spend on campaigns, with them—we may well look back on the 2008 election as a quaint time when the amounts spent on elections were relatively modest. Expect the floodgates to open, and the money to flow freely, as early as next year. (Source: Slate.com.) Obama Associations Suspect (Oct 2008) A blog commentor on Texas Darlin on an item of what hospital was Obama born in -- most state Queen's, though a few say Kapiolani. The following is a list of individuals and groups that are part of the Obama web, which is complex, spread wide and deep, with various people inter-connected with each other, and many with roots in Harvard. The early role of ACORN (previously known as NWRO) was to overload the welfare system with new applications, thus creating havoc and economic crisis. Their belief was that if they could create chaos, they could attain power and inroads. 1. Deepak Bhargava (born in India, late 30s to early 40s, graduate of Harvard, radical activist, worked for Acorn at same time Obama did. He is one of Acorn's lobbyists involved in pushing certain Democrats to create the low/no income loans via Fannie and Freddie. He directs an organization that has done work with minorities, financially supported by Robert Kennedy Jr., and is now active in 'training' immigrants to fight against interference of their illegal status. He and his organization are involved with dozens of other similar organizations. 2. George Wiley, in 60s a leader in the National Welfare Rights Org. (activists that invaded welfare offices often violently, threatening social workers), from which ACORN evolved with Wade Rathke who was also founder of Students for Democratic Society (supporting draft dodgers). Wade has headed Acorn for over 3 decades, and has his hands into a vast array of other like organizations, including a national movement to STOP Wal-Mart from expanding. While he espouses concern for workers and the underprivileged, his own vast number of workers have brought endless lawsuits against Acorn for abuse, threats, harassment, and retribution against those who have tried to organize themselves into their own labor union because of their low wages and no benefits. Wade has dealt harshly with each such incident, despite lawsuits. The first major center for Acorn was Chicago which remains one of its largest chapters. It 'trains' community organizers, and it is where Obama both learned and instructed. 3. William Ayers – former member of 60' Students for Democratic Society, friend of Wade Rathke since then. Tom Hayden also a member of SDS, and ally. And it should be noted that Ayres has been a long-time friend and ally of Rev. Wright, as well as the Booths and others listed here. Ayres is not an educational reformer, but possesses a radical 4. Citizen Action and Citizen Services – both organizations are 'sub' groups of Acorn, and go back in connection to Heather and Paul Booth – part of the SDS. Citizen action gave Citizen Services just under $500,000 for "campaign consulting" while at the same time Obama gave the same Citizen Services $840,000, both to serve the onslaught of new voter registration. Nearly 300 'sub' groups of Acorn are all listed at the same New Orleans address, despite claims by Obama and Acorn that such organizations are not connected. 5. Saul Alinsky Mastermind behind 'community organizers' movement that started in Chicago during the Depression – his more radical concepts serve as a foundation for other radicals mentioned herein. 6. Maude Hurde – President of Acorn, who has pronounced great pride in Acorn's accomplishments in pushing for sub-prime loans by Freddie and Fannie. She also submitted a demand to the Senate indicating exactly what she wanted the $700 billion to be used for (and at that time, Acorn was to receive 20% of any profits realized by the bailout). 7. Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven – professors in the 60s of Sociology at Columbia U. Their teachings, known as the "Cloward Piven Strategy" have served as the basic foundation of the Ayres/Acorn/Obama philosophy, and the actions of hundreds of allied organizations. The philosophy: "seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse." "Poor people can advance only when "the rest of society is afraid of them," When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. It is the CP Strategy that has been the guideline of Acorn from the beginning when turning out masses of welfare applicants. It is at the core of their strategy to add hundreds of thousands to voter registration, creating chaos. One can now wonder about the string of events over the last few years, to swell the economy with bad mortgages that would create economic crisis and the threat to a capitalistic society. There would appear to be a strong connection, in philosophy as well as action. Their article called for "cadres of aggressive organizers" to use "demonstrations to create a climate of militancy." Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help. Carefully orchestrated media campaigns, carried out by friendly, leftwing journalists, would float the idea of "a federal program of income redistribution," in the form of a guaranteed living income for all — working and non-working people alike. SOUND FAMILIAR? Note: the NRWO and Wiley was the first effort of Cloward and Piven to begin their revolution. "The flooding succeeded beyond Wiley's wildest dreams," writes Sol Stern in the City Journal. "From 1965 to 1974, the number of single-parent households on welfare soared from 4.3 million to 10.8 million. Giuliani accused the militant scholars by name, citing their 1966 manifesto as evidence that they had engaged in deliberate economic sabotage of New York. 8. George Soros Hungarian-born Jewish immigrant to the UK, later to the US. Billionaire (hedge funds) supporter of left movements. He adamantly believes in socialized medicine due to his experience of having a broken leg treated for free in England, while the Jewish community did not make such an offer. He is now anti-Jewish and pro socialist. Soros hates Bush, and put up $50 million (raised another $25 million) to defeat Bush in 04. He donates millions to MoveOn.org (liberal organization also supported by Annenberg). Soros hosted a fund raising event for Obama in his 2004 campaign for ILL legislature. They have met many times, and Soros continues to back Obama. He is supportive of Hamas, against Israel. He gives enormous financial support to dozens of leftist organizations including ACLU, Acorn, Amnesty Int., and several organizations that support illegal immigrants, open borders, and unlimited immigration. Soros continually exhibits anti-American rhetoric and attitude, and is responsible for the ad calling General Petraeus (General Betray Us) and the numerous campaigns of character assassination of Republicans. Soros invest billions into political efforts to sway the Senate, public opinion, activism – some regard him as owning the Democratic Party lock stock and barrel. He spends a good deal of time orchestrating foreign public opinion AGAINST the US – writing articles, giving interviews, funding propaganda campaigns etc. He seeks to get the US to stop further action against those who involved in jihad, and to sever the alliance between Israel and the US. 9. Acorn – Much has already been written about Acorn, but it springs from, or includes associations with all the above people. In the early 90s, and I quote from DiscovertheNetwork.org, "ACORN, Project Vote and Human SERVE — set to work lobbying energetically for the so-called Motor-Voter law, which Bill Clinton ultimately signed in 1993. The Motor-Voter bill is largely responsible for swamping the voter rolls with "dead wood" — invalid registrations signed in the name of deceased, ineligible or non-existent people — thus opening the door to the unprecedented levels of voter fraud and "voter disenfranchisement" claims that followed in subsequent elections." "The new "voting rights" coalition combines mass voter registration drives — typically featuring high levels of fraud — with systematic intimidation of election officials in the form of frivolous lawsuits, unfounded charges of "racism" and "disenfranchisement," and "direct action" (street protests, violent or otherwise). Just as they swamped America's welfare offices in the 1960s, Cloward-Piven devotees now seek to overwhelm the nation's understaffed and poorly policed electoral system. Their tactics set the stage for the Florida recount crisis of 2000, and have introduced a level of fear, tension and foreboding to U.S. elections heretofore encountered mainly in Third World countries." Over the last 15 years Acorn has been involved in untold lawsuits from various states, regarding charges of fraud in registration and voting. Now, 2 weeks before we vote, Acorn is once again overloading key states with fraudulent registration forms – forms they have had and sat on for the last year or more. 600,000 in one state, 200,000 in another; more than 1 million so far. It should be noted that Acorn, with the help of key Senators (Dodd, Reid, Obama and others) arranged a deal with the government whereby they are paid (handsomely) to create low income housing, or to fix up old structures for low income residents. Their deal enables them to hold the title to the properties and without oversight, they require the 'owner' to invest sweat equity into the building or remodeling. Once done and they move in, they are required to pay Acorn monthly for the home (that the government already paid them for). If they default, they walk away and Acorn remains the owner of the house. With so much money surrounding the Democrats overall campaigning in the US – most of which we don't even know about, there is more than enough money to throw at the 'problem' areas, people, etc. 10. Jennifer Brunner, Secy of State, Ohio – regarded as the most partisan politician in Ohio, she has been in office for almost 2 years, but involved in state voting issues for several years. She had promised to make sure the state did not have another voting day crisis as they did in 2000 and 2004. However, she reversed various orders by her predecessor, and had created a variety of rules and procedures to hamper the process rather than relieve it. She has received 'consultation' from Acorn (big surprise), and is presently not allowing absentee ballots for McCain to be counted, because they misprinted an extra check box on their form. Several people in the state indicate that her actions have been taken directly mar and hamper the upcoming election day, with unquestionable favor toward the Democratic party. This is by no means the whole list – but it is (I believe) sufficient to reflect accurately on just who Obama is, what his beliefs are, how he operates, and who he has surrounded himself with over the last 25 years. Add to this complex network, the associations with Odinga, Hamas, Al Monsour and others, and it is a disturbing collection with an obvious agenda. In addition to known associations, we have a situation where Obama has raised hundreds of millions dollars. Already seen in computer records under the small ($250 and under) donations, are bogus names (something like "wpwe ablvetu"). He has refused to release a list of major donors and his donation program online is handled by his 2 school chums from Pakistan. There is a STRONG indication that a great deal of money has come in to that online area from Middle East sources. Obama hides many of his associations, and of those exposed, he is non-apologetic. The most alarming aspect of this 'list' is that they are all aligned in a radical philosophy, with ties to Cloward and Piven, and Soros. These people have a strong agenda that has become a manifesto followed to the letter by dozens of organizations, notably Acorn. Even Obama's campaign and comments seem aligned with the teachings of Cloward and Piven. Based on the philosophy of these two, and the actions of this list (people and organizations) should be cause for everyone to stop and re-assess their thinking about Obama. Acorn vehemently denies wrong-doing, but they are at the absolute CORE of 20 years of wrong-doing, including their manipulation of our government to create the explosion of our economy and the housing debacle. Look at their beginnings, practices of intimidation and violence, manipulation, and how they adhere to the Cloward Piven Strategy and you have a company reeking of corruption and intent to bring down America as a capitalistic nation. We have EVERYTHING we 'know' and 'believe' at risk – as well as our futures, security, and FREEDOM. SOUR GRAPESMonday, August 11, 2008 Obama's Documented Lies: 155 and remarkably still growing
This therefore also excludes Flip Flops unless
NOTICE/DISCLAIMER: The content of this page is unofficial and the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of anyone associated with this page or any of those linked from this site. All opinions are those of the writer and are intended for entertainment purposes only. Links to other web pages are provided for convenience and do not, in any way, constitute an endorsement of the linked pages or any commercial or private issues or products presented there. Neither the DOD, the US Air Force, the 51st Fighter Wing nor Mickey Mouse has endorsed any of this site. All links are publicly accessible through the worldwide web. If there is any discrepancy between eye-witness accounts and OFFICIAL DOD records, this site opts to lend credence to the eye-witness views.
|
|
|
|
|
