The opinions expressed are those of the author and in no way represents any official statement of Kunsan AB or the USAF.

For USAF viewers, the standard rule for dealing with materials on government computers is "If you wouldn't show it to the Wing Commander, you shouldn't be looking at it." The pages dealing with the RECENT history of the USFK contains some materials that are NOT complimentary to the USFK. If you are on a government computer, you should use your judgement on viewing these pages.

If you wish to listen to some golden oldies from 1940s-1990s, click on the selection on the list below.
There are about 80 full-length songs to choose from.
(NOTE: Song audio degraded due to space limitations, but adequate for computer listening.)

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

For comments or inputs, contact:

Kalani O'Sullivan .

NOTICE/DISCLAIMER: The content of this page is UNOFFICIAL and the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of anyone associated with this page or any of those linked from this site. All opinions are those of the writer and are intended for entertainment purposes only. Links to other web pages are provided for convenience and do not, in any way, constitute an endorsement of the linked pages or any commercial or private issues or products presented there. Neither the DOD, the Air Force nor Mickey Mouse has endorsed any of this site. All Air Force links are publicly accessible through the worldwide web. If there is any discrepancy between eye-witness accounts and OFFICIAL DOD records, this site opts to lend credence to the eye-witness views.


HOW IT WAS!

Eagle

USFK ISSUES:

SEXUAL ASSAULTS


RETURN TO MAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS

America

TABLE OF CONTENTS



ON-BASE SEXUAL ASSAULTS


Cool Dolphin Award
Cool Dolphin Award of Excellence:
RoyceArt, Australia (NR)

Some of the awards this site has received. To view our awards, go to Awards .




SEXUAL ASSAULT BACKGROUND


Word of Caution: History Repeats Itself in Kunsan! (May 2003-December 2003)

EXCERPTED FROM: A-Town and Prostitution.

SITE APOLOGY: In May 2003 we stated, "It will be interesting to observe the effects of this latest move on the human suffering of the Kunsan AB female population." We are now sorry we stated this, as the stage was being set in July 2003 for history to repeat itself. WE APOLOGIZE. The misery inflicted is NOT interesting. We are hoped that we were wrong when we stated that "history repeats itself." We weren't wrong. History did repeat itself!!!

As of 13 December 2003, there had been two alleged rapes (26 Jul/24 Sep). There was also one alleged assault which most likely was an attempted rape (26 Aug); two alleged sexual assaults (29 Aug/3 Oct) and an unsubstantiated sexual assault (9 Oct). And these were only the ones we had seen in print -- with how many others unreported. After Dec 2003, the base imposed a news blackout on sexual incident reporting so this could no longer be tracked. We believe our fears had materialized -- but we no longer could track the alleged incidents.

The Korean bar owners appear to be right that there is a correlation between the off-limits sanctions of A-town and the increase in on-base assaults. After Dec 2003, we could no longer track incidents through the Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" section. Sexual incidents were no longer reported. We believe our fears were realized -- History does repeat itself!!!

Correlation between Blanket Off-limits Sanctions in A-town and On-base Sexual Assaults There is a word of caution to go along with the Wing Commander's current actions to attempt to shut down the operations of A-town by off-limits sanctions and curfew enforcement. In the past, tightening the screws on A-town resulted in skyrocketing numbers of rapes and assaults on women on base.

Prior to 2000, there were rapes on base were about four-five sexual assaults/rapes per year on base. Most were between parties that knew each other and it was not considered a serious problem.

However, in 2001, there seemed to be a correlation between the increased rates of assaults and rapes on base and the Wing Commander's application off-limits sanctions on A-town to cut off the supply of prostitution.
Though the sanctions were applied for "violent incidents" or "infractions," the primary reason appears to be the appearance of the "bar fine" system which turned the bars into "escort services" -- openly marketing prostitution. However, the Commander could not intercede because of the tacit approval of the Korean government in fostering prostitution.

Base females started complaining of prostitutes brought into the dormitories for sex and how the superiors did nothing about it.

In 2001, the Wing Commander used his powers to restrict A-town through off-limits restrictions for the slightest altercation with Korean nationals. After that the rate of sexual assaults on base increased incrementally.

The end result was that in 2001-2002, court martials for on-base rapes increased dramatically. How many complaints never reached the prosecution stage is unknown, but if it is like the U.S. norm -- only 10 percent of the rape cases were reported. (See Kunsan AB: Quality of Life: 2001 and Kunsan AB: Quality of Life: 2002 for details.)

The increase in violent rapes on base caused the Wing Commander to become concerned. Numerous rumors abounded over the increase in rapes/assaults on base that remained unreported. The acquittal of the Kadena AB SSgt for an alleged rape at Kunsan in 2000, would naturally have caused most females to distrust the "system" and contributed to the reluctance of the females to report incidents. (See August 26, 2000 issue of Pacific Stars and Stripes, "Kadena airman cleared of rape charges").

In addition, the sexual assaults that were reported in 2001 were stated to be "alcohol related" giving the impression that the females had somehow contributed to the incidents by their irresponsible drinking. The base was sending out all the wrong signals.

In February 2002, two airmen were convicted in Court Martial Hearings for rape/sodomy for incidents that occurred in the fall of 2001. During the early months of 2002, the Wing Commander keyed in on the problem of sexual assaults in the barracks. He stressed that such behavior would not be tolerated and the rates fell off dramatically -- at least for a while.

In the first half of 2003, there were few problems reported on sexual assaults, though undoubtedly they were occurring. But it did not seem to be a major problem.

However after the May 2003 announcement that the 8th FW would combat the bar fine with sanctions on the bars and judicial punishment for GIs, there seemed to be disbelief amongst many of Kunsan's people that this was actually happening and curfew violations in July resulted in Article 15 punishment for many. Soon the Kunsan folks got the idea that the Wing Commander was serious about his morality campaign.

As the new Wing Commander imposed more off-limits sanctions on A-town, the number of sexual assaults increased. By July 2003, some bar owners were commenting that because of the constant off-limits sanctions, there would soon be a repeat of 2001. The scuttlebutt they were hearing from the GIs seemed to bear them out. They seemed to obtain some perverse satisfaction that the Wing Commander would soon be on the receiving end of some horrific troubles of his own making.

By September 2003, the A-town bar owners seemed to be right as there appeared to be indeed a correlation between off-limits sanctions and an increase in sexual assaults/rapes on base. However, it was still too early to say it was a trend.

However, on 14 December 2003, the Wing Commander had his first conviction for a sexual assault that had occurred on 3 Oct. 2003 -- with two rapes cases still pending. It was just like 2001. It certainly seemed that history was repeating itself!!!


Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" Neutered to Suppress Sexual Assault/A-town Incident reporting (May 2003) Violent assaults and rapes were on the increase on base in 2003. The Crime Watch report showing the Security Police blotter suddenly started to become an embarassment as it document the on-going problems with enforcing an unpopular curfew.

In May 2003 the 8th FW announced its stance on human trafficking. (See A-town and Prostitution After the announcement, the "Crime Watch" section was NO LONGER PRINTED in the Wolf Pack Warrior. After this time, we could not track incidents via the "Crime Watch" blotter reports. We are uncertain of any alleged sexual assault/rape incidents or A-town related cases from May to August 2003.

After Aug 2003, there was a trend that the unpopular curfew on A-town was being challenged by many enlisted who were caught in the area. There was also an increase in the amounts of alleged on-base sexual assaults/rape incidents reported. Things were starting to get out of control.

Base Actions to Cover-up the "Paper-trail" on Sexual Assaults (Aug 2003) Starting in late-August or early-September 2003, the Kunsan AB site went off-line. One could no longer simply access the Wolf Pack Warrior via off-base computer via the internet. The electronic edition of the Wolf Pack Warrior was terminated.

Thus we obtained the latest crime developments through the hard-copy of the Wolf Pack Warrior which we picked up when we went to base -- however, it was only periodic to shop for groceries at the commissary. Thus there are lapses in our coverage.

The website came back on line sometime in late-November or early-December 2003. However, when the Kunsan AB site came back on line, many of the electronic editions of the Wolf Pack Warrior were missing. What we found significant was that there were SELECTED issues of the Wolf Pack Warrior missing.

In Dec 2003 the base undertook a news blackout on this high-profile area and all news reports from the base had eliminated all published reports sexual assaults. The squeaky clean Crime Watch blotter report in the newspaper gave that IMPRESSION.

Then back issues of the Wolf Pack Warrior were selectively removed from the 8th FW website. The Wolf Pack Warrior issues that contained "Crime Watch" statements dealing with sexual assaults on base were selectively deleted. Without getting into the FOIA issues, someone decided with forethought to remove only these SELECTED issues. This appeared to be back issue censorship -- at its most blatant.

In Feb 2004, the Wolf Pack Warrior on-line editions were removed altogether AGAIN. Kunsan AB was withdrawing behind its firewall -- as is their perogative. The "Crime Watch" Blotter in the hard copy Wolf Pack Warrior was squeaky clean with NO sex-related assaults/incidents nor any curfew incidents in A-town throughout January 2004. At the end of Feb 2004, the Wolf Pack Warrior on-line page was removed from the Kunsan AB Website. At that time it was unknown as to the duration. Slowly back issues started to appear with significant blanks.

Either the Wolf's morality campaign had a miraculous turn-around success in curtailing abuses -- or the Police blotter entries were being censored as to what was published. We believe the latter as airmen were still receiving Article 15s for curfew violations (Article 92 violation) in the hard-copy Wolf Pack Warrior -- and we continue to hear second-hand reports of incidents in A-town. Even the Article 15 entries in the papers appear to be censored, but we can't be certain. It just appeared that the published punishments seemed to follow patterns dealing with the latest interest item.

Though the Wolf Pack Warrior was published weekly, the policy of SELECTED issues missing continued.
It appears that issues containing exercise information are not put on line for OPSEC reasons -- though any Korean on base could pick up a copy at the BX or Post Office. Likewise embarassing information of the base "Quality of Life" issues were censored. No info on sex assaults or such incidents on base went outside the Intranet -- though Town Patrol incidents on drunk and disorderly and curfew violations were reported in the base newspaper.

In Aug 2004 we noticed that the Kunsan AB site was again on-line in full operation -- and was probably so for a few months. However, the new and improved "edited" version of the Wolf Pack Warrior Crime Watch showed how the base had NO problems at all with "nothing to report." As it is currently, the Crime Watch serves no purpose -- except to give people a false sense of security. However, because this area had become a DoD and USAF Special Interest Item, sexual assaults was never mentioned. It was a Special Interest area for the Feb 2004 Unit Compliance Inspection. By Sep 2004, it looked as though the DoD will enter the morality business and put some teeth into the UCMJ dealing with consorting with prostitutes.

At Kunsan, as seen by articles from the hierarchy in the Wolf Pack Warrior, the viewpoint is that alcohol is a primary contributor to sexual assaults. In other words, the woman who was assaulted was a CONTRIBUTOR to the assault. This is a very unhealthy attitude for anyone in a position of responsibility. However, as was mentioned here, this attitude absolves the hierarchy of the responsibility for the conditions on the base that permit such sexual assaults to continue. It allowed the security patrols of the base to be reactive rather than proactive in preventing such crimes.

In Aug 2004 we noticed that the Kunsan AB site was again on-line -- and probably had been for a few months before we noticed it.

However, in checking the back issues on the site, we found that though the Wolf Pack Warrior was published weekly, the policy of censoring SELECTED issues from the web had continued. It appears that issues containing exercise information are not put on line for OPSEC reasons -- though any Korean on base could pick up a copy at the BX or Post Office. No info on sex assaults, though Town Patrol incidents on drunk and disorderly and curfew violations.

EPILOGUE: In Aug 2004 we noticed that the Kunsan AB site was again on-line probably for a few months. Though published weekly, the policy of SELECTED issues missing continued until they got the editorial "exclusion" policies straight. It appears that issues containing exercise information are not put on the web for OPSEC reasons -- though any Korean on base could pick up a copy at the BX or Post Office. No map of the base is on the base website, but the detailed map is published prior to any exercise in the Wolf Pack Warrior. Similarly, no info on sex assaults/rapes (if there are any), though Town Patrol incidents on drunk and disorderly and curfew violations. By Sep 2004, the heat was being turned up USFK wide over sexual misbehavior and the talk is that a new UCMJ addition will put teeth into consorting with prostitutes. With that A-town will die, if this new UCMJ ruling comes about -- and this is NOT a pretty topic when the wing commander's only control on prostitution flies out the window. It WILL go underground -- and it will survive as it has for thousands of years in civilized society.

This is why this thread is NOT monitored any longer. It's a waste of time. As of December 2003, there appeared to be a news blackout on anything relating to sex offenses both off and on-base. It continued through Sep 2004 and can be expected to continue on as Prostitution and Human Trafficking has become an international issue.
Coercion of Yahoo User Group to Remove Archived Messages: In Dec 2003, it appeared that on-base "coercion" from unknown entities -- for example, talks with military individuals by OSI dealing with OPSEC and the handling of Yahoo moderated bulletin boards/newsgroups dealing with A-town topics. The OSI targeted the moderator of the user groups. These user groups were suddenly "purged" their archives in Dec 2003 meaning the three-year archives of messages on the topics of assaults and prostitution were suddenly wiped clean. It was all done for the sake of OPSEC -- or was it? Was it simply a method to remove damaging and embarassing materials from public viewing? Regardless, the archives are gone.

By Dec 2003, the Yahoo User group Kunsan and A-Town became a very boring place to visit...essentially as no one was talking anymore. All it took was the word that the OSI was watching the postings and everyone -- past and present -- stopped posting. However, the primary goal was accomplished when the three-year archives of posting by various people on incidents in A-town and on-base was dumped. There was no more embarassing public records of these archived messages.

By Sep 2004, the once stimulating bulletin board was becoming a very boring place with only periodic inquiries as to an old girlfriend or questions about a new girl in a bar. The heavier issues were no longer discussed. Periodically there was an interesting post -- but A-town was becoming a boring place with the new "morality" campaign fostered by the USFK -- zero-tolerance policy on human trafficking and prostitution -- and the User Group reflected this.

Sexual Assaults becomes Command Special Interest Item -- and Incidents No Longer Published The AFOSI reminded the people of Kunsan of their OPSEC responsibilities dealing with the operations of Kunsan AB. "Morale and good order" falls under this purview. It also appeared that items "under investigation" would be pulled from publication in the Wolf Pack Warrior. In the 9 Jan 2004 Wolf Pack Warrior under "Unit Compliance Inspection (UCI) Preparations", one of the USAF Special Interest items was "Sexual Assault Deterrence and Response" and "Operations Security." In addition, there has been no Electronic Wolf Pack Warrior editions placed on the net since Nov 2003 -- so that the outside world was blind to what happens on Kunsan AB.

AS OFJANUARY 2004, WE WILL NO LONGER MONITOR THIS THREAD. IT IS OUR OPINION THAT ANY INFORMATION IN THIS AREA WILL BE "PROTECTED" AS UNDER INVESTIGATION. HOWEVER, OUR POSITION REMAINS THAT SPECIFICS OF SEXUAL ASSAULTS/RAPES NEED NOT BE MENTIONED, BUT THE EVENTS SHOULD BE POSTED TO WARN THE AIRMEN OF THE DANGERS AROUND THEM. THE HIERARCHY OWES THEIR TROOPS THAT MUCH. HOWEVER, THE HIERARCHY MAY NOT SEE IT IN THE SAME LIGHT AS WE DO.


The following are the Crime Watch blotter synopsis dealing with alleged sexual assaults/rape incidents and curfew violations in A-town. The period covered is from 2 May 2003 - 9 Jan 2004. After Jan 2004, it was obvious that sexual incidents were being consciously edited out of the newspaper because sexual assaults had become a Command High Interest Item.

  • Crime Watch (2 May-9 May) No crime reports published. (NOTE: Maj. Eric Werner, Deputy Staff Judge Advocate writes article on "Wolf Pack, USFK Combating Human Trafficking, Prostitution." in the Wolf Pack Warrior.)

  • (16 May) No crime reports published.

  • (23 May) No crime reports published.

  • (30 May) No crime reports published.

  • (6 Jun) No crime reports published.

  • (13 Jun) No crime reports published.

  • (20 Jun) No crime reports published.

  • (27 Jun) No crime reports published.

  • (4 Jul) No crime reports published.

  • 11 Jul) No crime reports published.

  • (18 Jul) No crime reports published.

  • (25 Jul) No crime reports published.

  • (1 Aug) "Crime Watch" published. (1 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 18-26 Jul)

    In the 1 Aug issue of the Wolf Pack Warrior, it stated that on July 26: "Article 120, Rape and carnal knowledge -- A staff sergeant called the SFCC and said a female had told him she'd been raped. Patrolman, responded to building 1430. The female said the subject fled the scene after raping her."

    An article appeared of the Wing Commander placing A-town Off-limits in the 1 Aug 2003 issue of the Wolf Pack Warrior. The reason was that there was stated as: "An incident in America Town involving threats against several Kunsan airmen Saturday caused a temporary ban of U.S. servicemembers from frequenting the area." (This incident is covered under the A-town Section at A-town and Prostitution: A-town Off-limits with both sides claiming righteousness. The base claimed they were protecting the troops and praised the actions of off-duty Town Patrol security police in controlling the situation. On the other side, the A-town bar owners claimed the Town Patrol aided an off-duty town patrol man who had thrown a Korean woman to the ground to escape to base in a taxi -- without the Korean National Police involvement. The woman was traumatized and taken to a local hospital.

    The point is that the A-town incident on 27 July 2003 is NOT covered in the "Crime Watch" in neither the 1 Aug issue nor the 8 Aug issue. The official reason was that the investigation was on-going.
  • (8 Aug) "Crime Watch" published and showed no sexual assault incidents with only one A-town curfew violation. (8 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 28 Jul-3 Aug)

    An article in the 8 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior showed that in July the base was having some problems enforcing their new off-limits sanctions in A-town with their troops.

    • A technical sergeant from the 8th Maintenance Squadron received Article 15 punishment for being in America Town after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture of $500 pay and a reprimand.

    • A staff sergeant from the 8th MXS received Article 15 punishment for being in A-town after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture of $500 pay and a reprimand.

    • An airman first class from the 8th Communication Squadron received Article 15 punishment for attempting to break curfew and wrongful solicitation of prostitution, violations of Articles 80 and 134, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of reduction to the grade of airman.

    • An airman first class from the 8th CS received Article 15 punishment for attempting to break curfew, fleeing apprehension, indecent exposure and wrongful solicitation of prostitution, violations of Articles 80, 95, and 134, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of suspended reduction to the grade of airman and 60 days restriction to base.
  • (15 Aug) "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents reported. (15 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 4-10 Aug)

  • (22 Aug) "Crime Watch" published. The infractions continued with A-town curfew violations. (15 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 11-17 Aug)

    From the amounts of Article 15s handed out, the base continued to have problems enforcing its the A-town curfew in July amongst its personnel.

    This may have prompted the base to accept a more realistic curfew for A-town in August: "America Town hours published as noon to midnight Fridays and Saturdays, and noon to 11 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays. The Oriental Club remains off-limits to all military personnel." (SITE NOTE: Notice that all are for Article 92, Failure to Obey a Direct Order or Regulation -- meaning Curfew violation ... not the prostitution aspect which is harder to prove.)

    • Aug. 14: Article 92, Failure to obey an order or regulation — While conducting a perimeter check of America Town after it was closed at 9 p.m., three Town Patrol members saw a vehicle with four military people in it pass by. Two Town Patrol members gave foot pursuit but were unable to stop the vehicle. A call was placed to to the SFCC relaying the vehicle's information. The vehicle was stopped before entering Kunsan Air Base. Town Patrol members arrived and identified the vehicle's passengers who were detained.

    • Article 92, Failure to obey order or regulation; and Article 95, Resistance, flight, breach of arrest and escape — A Town Patrol member notified the SFCC a specialist had been apprehended for Article 92 and Article 95 violations. The specialist was in America Town when he saw two security forces members walking towards him. He turned and ran away when they asked him what he was doing in the off-limits part of A-Town. The specialist turned the corner and came to a dead end where he complied with the security forces members' commands.

    • A staff sergeant from the 8th Maintenance Squadron received Article 15 punishment for being in America Town after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of reduction to the grade of senior airman, forfeiture $912 pay per month for two months, and a reprimand.

    • A staff sergeant from the 8th MXS received Article 15 punishment for being in A-town after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture $500 pay and a reprimand.

    • A senior airman from the 8th MXS received Article 15 punishment for being in Atown after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of reduction to the grade of airman first class, forfeiture $250 pay, and a reprimand.

    • A senior airman from the 8th MXS received Article 15 punishment for being in A-town after curfew, a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. The commander imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture $250 pay and a reprimand.
  • (29 Aug): "Crime Watch" published. (29 Aug Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 18-24 Aug)

  • (5 Sep): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. POSSIBILITY OF DELETION FROM WEBSITE AFTER THE FACT. "Crime Watch" published. The following was excerpted from the 5 Sep hard-copy edition of the Wolf Pack Warrior.

    (1). First incident: On Aug 26, "Article 128, Assault -- An airman 1st class called the SFCC and said a staff sergeant was assaulted in her room by an unknown assailant. Patrolmen were briefed and dispatched. The staff sergeant told the patrolmen she had answered the door and an unknown individual forced his way in. In her attempt to get him to leave, the unknown individual struck her in the face and fled."

    (2). Second incident: "On Aug 29, "Article 128, Assault -- A senior airman radioed the SFCC and stated an airman first class had just been assaulted. Patrolmen were briefed and dispatched. When they arrived on scene, the airman first class reported she had been assaulted while inside the Loring Club and also while walking back to her dorm by a senior airman whom she knew. Patrolmen went to the suspect's dorm room and brought the senior airman outside to be identified as the assailant. The senior airman was apprehended."
  • (13 Sep) "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents. (13 Sep Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 1-7 Sep)

  • (19 Sep): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents. (19 Sep Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 8-14 Sep)

  • (26 Sep): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents. (26 Sep Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers the period of 15-21 Sep)

  • (3 Oct): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. POSSIBILITY OF DELETION FROM WEBSITE AFTER THE FACT.

    The hard copy of the Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" stated: On 24 Sep an individual was raped in the barracks and the individual who committed the act apprehended. The offender was turned over to the OSI. "SFCC received a 911 call that an airman had been raped. Emergency medical technicians and patrolmen were briefed and responded. Responding patrols arrived on scene and came in contact with the victim, who told the responding units the name and residence of the suspect. Patrolmen responded to suspect's residence, while EMT, followed by a patrolman, transporte the victim to the hospital. At the supsect's residence, the patrolment apprehended the suspect. Some patrolmen remained at the room to secure the scene and to await Air Force office of special investigations' arrival. The suspect was transported to the SFCC and detained. The suspect was then transported to AFOSI for questioning. Patrolmen assumed security for suspect's room. AFSOI has taken over investigations."
  • (10 Oct): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. POSSIBILITY OF DELETION FROM WEBSITE AFTER THE FACT. Contents unknown. However, on 12 Dec, the Wolf Pack Warrior reported an incident that happened on 3 Oct. A female was sexually assaulted in her room after a co-worker entered her room through a window. He pled guilty and was sentenced in December. (See Dec 12 issue for details.)

  • (17 Oct): "Crime Watch" published. (17 Oct Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers the period of 27 Sep-12 Oct)

    In the Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" for 17 October: 9 October: Sexual assault -- A master sergeant called the SFCC and said one of his troops had allegedly been sexually assaulted. Patrolmen were briefed and dispatched.
  • (24 Oct): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. Contents unknown.

  • (31 Oct): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. The 31 Oct issue hard copy of the Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" had no incidents besides an Army Warrant Officer with a curfew violation in A-town.

  • (7 Nov): NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. Contents unknown.

  • (14 Nov): "Crime Watch" published. (26 Sep Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers the period of 3-9 Nov) According to the Wolf Pack Warrior there was an incident not listed as sex-related, but it certainly seems suspicious.

    The incident was: "Nov 8: Article 180, Attempted breaking and entering; Article 128, Burglary; Article 134, Disorderly conduct and drunkeness -- A senior airman called the SFCC and reported an unidentified person was pounding on her door. Patrolmen were briefed and dispatched. A patrolman made contact with the senior airman who identified the person pounding on her door as an Army private she said she'd been on the phone with earlier. The private had also allegedly attempted to gain entry into her room through her window. Two patrolmen apprehended the private and transported him to the SFCC." Not a very good burglar, but more like someone hell bent on trying to get close to one of the flirtatious "Kunsan Queens." This is almost identical to the Oct 3 sexual assault breakin -- but this intruder never got into the room.)
  • (21 Nov): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents. (21 Nov Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 10-16 Nov.)

  • (28 Nov): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related incidents. Only one A-town incident with some Army individuals refusing to pay the A-town bus fare. (28 Nov Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 17-23 Nov.)

  • (5 Dec): "Crime Watch" publication unknown. NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED.

  • (12 Dec): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related or A-town incidents. NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED. (12 Dec Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 1-7 Dec.)

    The Wolf Pack Warrior on Dec 12, 2003 reported the first sex conviction for the year.

    Wolf Pack sergeant jailed for unlawful entry, indecent assault.

    "A staff sergeant fro the 8th Operations Support Squadron was courtmartialed for violating Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, indecent assault and unlawful entry, Dec 3 at Kunsan Air Base. Staff Sgt. John Goolsby was accused of illegally entering a co-worker's dormitory room and sexually assaulting her Oct. 9. He was charged with unlawful entry and indecent assault. The sergeant pleaded guilty in front of a military judge and was sentenced to be reduced to E-4 and to serve six months confinement. ... This is the first sexual assault court-martial this year, and the facts of the case demonstrate how one of the top contribuitng factor, alcohol, often plays a role in this type of crime.

    In this case, Sergeant Goolsby was intoxicated the evening of the assault. While drunk, he went to the victim's room and knocked on her door. When she did not answer, he proceeded outside to her window and ripped a hole in the screen of the window. He climbed into the room and sat on the victim's bed. Although sexual intercouerse did not happen, he repeatedly touched her even though she told him "no" several times. When the vicitm said "no" again, Sergeant Goolsby left the room through the door.


    There were several aggravating factors in this incident. First, the victim was a co-worker of the offender. Second, the offender was married. Finally, the sergeant had to climb through a window in order to commit his crime.

    The day the incident occurred, Sergeant Goolsby confessed to security forces. He later decided to enter into a plea agreement whereby he would plead guilty at a special court-martial tried by a military judge alone. Because he pleaded guilty, the maximum sentence he faced was reduction to E-1, forteiture of two thirds pay per month for 12 months, confinement for 12 months, and a bad conduct discharge. ...

    There is a clear message to be sent out by this case; sexual assault is a very serious crime. The Eighth Fighter Wing will use all its resources to investitate these offenses and ensure justice is achieved in the prosecution of these who wrongfully commit sexual assaults."
  • (19 Dec): Publication unknown. (Appears to be last publication of 2003.) NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED.

  • (26 Dec): Publication unknown. Possibly issue not published as Christmas holiday on Thursday, but rather strange not to have a holiday edition. NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED.

  • (2 Jan 2004): Publication unknown. Possibly issue not published as New Year's holiday on Thursday, but rather strange not to have a holiday edition. NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED.

  • (9 Jan 2004): "Crime Watch" published with no sex-related incidents. Only one A-town incident with an Army individual walking around A-town without a wingman. (28 Nov Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" covers 19 Dec-4 Jan) NO ELECTRONIC WOLF PACK WARRIOR PRODUCED.

    The 9 Jan Wolf Pack Warrior also contained an article by SrA Cat Trombly, 8th FW Public Affairs. The article "WPW changes with New Year" stated, "Another section you read a lot is the blotter. A few of you made comments that you are sick of seeing all the noise compaints and just want to see the "juicy" material. .. We publish the blotters as a deterrent. It is our hope that when you see a complaint in the blotter, whether it is an assault or noise complaint, you will think twice if you are ever in that position. It is our policy to print the majority of the blotters, and Col. Robin Rand, 8th Fighter Wing commander, has rarely asked us to pull one from the paper. We will continue with this policy. .. One person asked if we could put more info in the blotters, such as squadron. The answer is no. Often times, blotter entries are still under investigation when we publish them so we leave names and sqadrons out. If the person receives an article 15, we include rank and unit; if the person is court-martialed, name and unit will be there. Again, we do all of this as a deterrent."
The "Crime Watch" Blotter was squeaky clean with NO sex-related assaults/incidents nor any curfew incidents in A-town throughout January. By the end of Feb 2004, the Crime Watch blotter had been sanitized. It was nauseatingly squeaky clean -- where everyone lived in a safe and crime free environment. Wasn't it wonderful to know how safe and boring Kunsan AB became with the simple editing of the newspaper? (Sarcasm showing.) The following is from the 5 Mar 2004 Wolf Pack Warrior:

  • Feb 23: Nothing to report

  • Feb 24: Nothing to report

  • Feb 25: Nothing to report

  • Feb 26: Nothing to report

  • Feb 27: Nothing to report

  • Feb 28: Theft of private property -- An airman walked in the security forces control center relaying he woke up at 9 a.m. and notice his computer was missing. The airman said his roommate was packing when he went to bed. The airman said when he woke up he noticed his laptop computer and roommate were both gone. The roommate had left at 4 a.m. for Seoul to catch his plane for his PCS to Kadena AB, Japan.

  • Feb 29: Nothing to report
(EPILOGUE: By Sep 2004, the blotter contained more relevant items -- but still was devoid of any sexual activity misbehavior. A-town incidents were primarily drunk and disorderly or failure to obey type incidents. Sexual Assaults remained a USAF and PACAF Special Interest Inspection item.)


CONCLUSION: (Jan 2004) By 13 December 2003, there had been two alleged rapes (26 Jul/24 Sep). There was also one alleged assault which most likely was an attempted rape (26 Aug); two alleged sexual assaults (29 Aug/3 Oct) and another alleged sexual assault (9 Oct). And these were only the ones we had seen in print.

If the Wing Commander was not worried about his morality campaign, he should have been. He had just gotten his first sexual assault conviction on Dec 03 and the results of the other rape cases were still pending. The situation was just like in 2001. History was starting to repeat itself!!!


As in the past, we feared that like in the U.S. only 10 percent of all rapes are ever reported so this may have been the start of another sordid episode at Kunsan. Sexual assaults is the most under-reported crime on the books. We could only assume that at Kunsan many cases went unreported for a variety of reasons as well.

What we saw was that as the sexual assaults spiraled out of control, there was a conscious effort on the part of the 8th FW leadership to remove the "paper-trail" in the "Crime Watch" that provided embarrassing clues to what was going on at Kunsan AB. Wolf Pack Warrior electronic editions being selectively deleted from the 8th FW home page between September-November 2003.

The stoppage of reporting of these alleged crimes in "Crime Watch" made tracking impossible. The Security Police blotters were suddenly squeaky clean. As a result, we stopped monitoring the Crime Watch blotter in Jan 2004. We anticipated that in 2004 the editing of the crime blotter reports on Kunsan would continue well into the future as a policy of the Wing leadership.

The authorities may have felt that such reports impeded AFOSI investigations or that the prosecution's case in court martials may have been prejudiced by published reports. However, we felt in Jan 2004 that if the base had decided to censor the information (without getting into any FOIA issues), there should atleast have made an entry such as "Attempted rape: details withheld." as a minimum to heighten the awareness of the troops to the dangers around them. We felt the leadership owed their troops that much. It never happened -- and instead sexual assaults disappeared from the Crime Watch report -- but not from Kunsan and Korea.

Base Takes Standard Position: Alcohol is the Contributor to Sexual Assaults On 3 Oct 2003, the Lt Col Don "Sheriff" Wahonick, 8th Security Forces Commander, wrote an article in the Wolf Pack Warrior. In it he offered some advice, "I just want to share some insight I've gained over the years on victimization that hopefully will help you avoid becoming a victim. It's simple really: Don't drink too much!" Gadzooks...this a repeat of the "alcohol related" excuse of 2001 to explain away increase in the sexual assaults. He went on, "...I do hope that if you drink, when you drink, you won't drink to excess to the point where you become a victim, or worse, a predator."

Labeling alcohol as the cause for the vile behavior may make the base powers-to-be feel better in excusing themselves from responsibility. But the truth is that "Alcohol usage" is nothing more than a cop-out excuse to divert the attention from the true root causes. Their actions to seal off A-town and impose their moral codes on their forces are not brought into question. The safety issues for women living in dormitories are not questioned. The safety on the base for women walking alone from the Loring Club to their dormitories is not surfaced. These questions and many more crop up as you read the "Crime Watch" accounts. Security patrols need to be proactive -- not reactive.


Lt. Col Wahonick's neatly packaged words of advice place the blame on the victim and predator -- without accepting the fact that when you pen up the sheep with a tiger in a cage like Kunsan Air Base, you create special problems that the leadership must confront. If you cut off the sexual-hunter from his supply of sexual relief in A-town, he will turn to hunting sheep on Kunsan.

In December, the base continued to place the blame on alcohol as a primary cause for these sexual incidents. We disagree. If alcohol use is NOT acceptable in excusing someone for committing a violent crime, why should alcohol use be considered acceptable as excusing someone for committing a sexual assault or rape case? It isn't ... and it has never has been. Alcohol use simply reduces the inhibitions that keep the baser instincts in check for an individual prone to this type of sexual behavior. The sexual predator was always there. Alcohol just made it easier for him to act on his vile drives.

EPILOGUE: In 2005, the USFK leadership was again blaming alcohol as a reason for sexual assaults. The reasoning was that many of the sexual assaults was amongst young enlisted and alcohol was a factor, the drinking age should be increased from 20 to 21.



OPINION: THE SEXUAL PREDATOR

Sexual Predators: We feel that sex between two consenting adults is none of our business -- and also none of the military's business as well. The Appelate Courts agree with this viewpoint -- that sex in private is just that. It's private. But the military still persists for the sake of good order and discipline -- especially when it comes to sex between homosexuals. But the keep point is that it is CONSENTUAL -- meaning that the two adults engage in sex by mutual agreement.

But how about prostitutes? Without getting into the morality of prostitution, we also see the act of an individual visiting a prostitute as a consentual act where both parties agree -- much in the same way a man buys a new tie. He pays for what he gets. The prostitute is there by choice. This is consentual and to us it is all right. (NOTE: We are not getting into human trafficking or any other ticklish issues. We are simply talking about prostitutes who earn their living this way by their free choice. The sex is bought and paid for without any emotional attachments. It is a business transaction.)

But what about the male who forces his attentions on a female against her will? This is NOT consentual. This is a rapist -- and we have no pity on him as he is a criminal. His act is as vile as it comes and feel he should be prosecuted to the extent of the law. An Okinawan lady who was allegedly raped by a US military civilian employee testified in Mar 2005 that she wanted her attacker castrated so he would not be able to perpetrate his crime on any other women forever. We tend to agree with her. A rapist is a criminal who uses violence or force to gain his way -- without thought of the victim. As such society should view the rapist in the same manner as a savage beast that is a menace to society -- and needs to be locked away or put to death.

However, what about the sexual predator? This is the person that lulls his victims into a false sense of security and then strikes when the opportunity presents itself. The sexual predator is not in the same class as the rapist because he "convinces" his victim of his trustworthiness. He is a "buddy" and a "friend" -- someone she can trust. However, in truth, he is only after consentual sex. The problem is that these predators can be anyone -- they are the solid leaders and outstanding workers you see everyday or the fast-talking scum ball who is all talk. The sexual predator is just an ordinary person with unusually high sexual desires -- and a low-estimation of the worth of others when compared to his sexual needs. Most commanders are shocked when presented with cases of individuals involved in on-base sexual assaults. Many offenders are married career NCOs with families stateside. Most are outstanding workers and leaders. Some have used their positions of authority in fraternization cases with their subordinates. There is no identifying characteristic. He could be anyone.

If the sex is consentual, then it is not a crime -- though the individual has just used another without an emotional bonds to gratify his sexual needs. It would be considered morally wrong on his part, but not legally. Because the act was consentual, we may not think much of the individual as a human being, but it was consentual. This is NOT a crime -- no matter how despicable the individual.

But what if the sexual predator gets the female drunk and takes advantage of her condition? Many times the sexual predator uses a situation where alcoholic intoxication is involved -- to one either overcome the inhibitions of the female; or two, to get the female so drunk she passes out. This is NOT consentual sex -- but simply rape. It is while the female is intoxicated and passed out when the individual has sex with her. It has been legally established that under such conditions, it is forcible rape. It is a punishable act under the UCMJ.

We consider it just as heinous as a violent rape in the sense that the sexual predator played upon the person's trust. The person seeking sex passes himself off as someone to be trusted while in fact he is awaiting an opportunity to have sex with the other. He does so without any concern for the feelings of the other. They only seek their sexual gratification using any means they can -- including intoxification -- to obtain their goal. They pretend to be friends -- but in reality care not a twit about the others humanity or dignity. These sexual predators come in all ranks. There are all forms of this -- but it has a common thread that there was trust involved. In the end, the victim feels all the anguish, feelings of defilement and emotion upheaval of one who was violently raped.

This would fall into the category of "date rape" by someone who is an acquaintance of the other. The bad thing about this crime is that when the female claims she was raped, the sexual predator will claim it was consentual. This causes the problem of who do you believe? In many cases, the female will not report such an act for a multitude of reasons. The sexual predator knows this -- and moves on to other targets. Sexual assaults is one of the most under-reported crimes on the books. Many career military women have had to make a choice of their career being "tarnished" by reporting an sexual incident or simply learning to live with it. Some made the choice of silence, but in later years told their stories in hopes of helping others.


Sexual Predators On-base The military cannot deny that in overseas areas where the scarcity of "roundeyes" and "sisters" are available, the military females who in the continental US would not even turn the head of a soldier, suddenly gets "hit on" with regularity. It is "sexual harassment" if it were offensive to these women, but to them this sudden attention can be quite flattering. At Kunsan these vamps were called the "Kunsan Queens" that hang out at the Loring Club like queen bees with other little bees showering attention on them. These are one potential target for a sexual predator.

The other more likely target is their co-worker and friend. These people develop a friendship with a female coworker who comes to trust the individual as someone like family. On isolated tours, without the familiar faces, one latches on to ones coworkers to build a family-like relationship. In fact, leadership fosters this idea of unit cohesiveness. It has come as a shock to some females that after becoming intoxicated and passing out with one of these "friends" in the room -- only to awake to find them atop them in bed or performing other sex acts. This is a sexual predator. They pose as friends simply awaiting the opportunity.

One of the most hurtful in our memory (over a decade ago) was a plain-looking female sergeant on TDY to Saudi Arabia who was hit on by a young Captain. Showering attention on her, he was certainly discretely intimate with her by the way she hung all over him. When the TDY was over, she was at the pool with him and said, "We'll get together when we get back, won't we?" He turned and said coldly, "Yeah, sure." I watched the hurt on that girl's face as she realized that she had been used and this fraternization was simply a TDY fling. This Captain was guilty of fraternization and a lot of other offenses -- because it turned out he was married as well -- but he was a classic example of a sexual predator. He wanted sex -- and got it using his guiles and playing on the needs of lonely girl.

Sexual Predators and Off-limits Sanctions In overseas areas on an isolated tour like Korea, we believe these types of individuals normally would seek the "safer" prostitutes off-base to satisfy their sexual needs. However, in recent years, the penalties for being caught with a prostitute has gotten stiffer and stiffer. The paying of a "bar fine" was defined as equal to the act of buying a prostitute -- as it gave the impression of prostitution. However, those caught were punished under violating a general order (Article 92). Before when one had sex in the camptowns, one's only worry was picking up a wierd strain of some sexually transmitted disease. Now it was being reported to the OSI for a liaison with a hooker. The risks were getting very great to step into this area...though there were many "workarounds" in place before the year was out.

Thus what we fear the greatest is that the sexual predators will turn on the females on base once their off-base "supply" for sexual release is cut off by off-limits sanctions and curfews -- not counting the threats of Article 134 action in 2005 dealing with prostitution. With the USFK's latest morality campaign under the title of "zero-tolerance policy on prostitution," the sexual predator has been caged up with the lambs.



OPINION: HISTORY WILL REPEAT ITSELF!!!

Correlation between USFK Curfew/Off-Limits Sanctions and Sexual Assaults: In Korea, there is a correlation between the curfew sanctions and off-limits sanctions in recent years with on-base sexual assaults.

(SITE NOTE: See Word of Caution: History May Repeat Itself! (May 2003-December 2003) for what we discovered while tracking the increase of on-base rapes/sexual assaults using the Kunsan Wolf Pack Warrior "Crime Watch" reports when Kunsan Air Base placed A-town off-limits in 2003. At the beginning of May 2003, we had issued a warning that the base MAY experience the same phenomena of increases in on-base assaults/rapes that occurred in 2001 when a previous base commander has used off-limits sanctions excessively against A-town (American town, the local camptown and bar row 3 miles from the base). On-base rapes/sexual assaults sky-rocketed.)
However, what we did found out -- to our disgust -- was that there WAS a correlation between off-limits sanctions and on-base assaults. What we knew at a gut-level from our life-long experiences throughout Asia, we proved to our mind that the USFK was playing with fire in taking on a morality crusade in Korea to stop prostitution and human trafficking. It was going to backfire on them. It is said that only 10 percent of all rapes and assaults are ever reported. DoD admits that sexual assaults are probably one of the most under-reported crimes in the military and civilian life.

Unfortunately, the USFK is caught in a trap of its own making -- and international affairs where the push to eliminate human trafficking has become a key issue from the highest levels. Therefore, as a human rights issue, the USFK is forced to attempt to enforce its moral code upon its soldiers. Unfortunately, it is fighting a losing battle if it attempts to enforce its values on the Korean society. Though the US may praise the ROK for its strides in preventing human trafficking and the promises the ROK has made to stop prostitution, even the Korean people don't believe it is possible. The ROK is NOT a signator of the UN Protocol on the Prevention of Human Trafficking simply because sex is Big Business in Korea.

If one lives in the Korean environment, one has to come to grips with the fact that though prostitution is a way of life in Korea. Legal prostitution was abolished in 1948. However, the current anti-prostitution law - a bill which gave a virtual green light to red-light districts - was enacted in 1961. According to the report released by the Korean Institute of Criminology (KIC) in March 2003, the nation's sex trade was estimated at 24 trillion won ($20.4 billion) in 2002, accounting for 4.1 percent of 578 trillion won, the total GDP. (See Koreans are Hypocrites on Prostitution for details on the Korean sex trade)


OPINION: INSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS WITH SEXUAL ASSAULTS

Institutional Problem with Definition of Sexual Assault According to the Defense Department, 701 rape cases were reported in 2002 throughout the military. The Army reported 196 cases; the Air Force, 234 cases; the Navy and Marines, 271 cases combined. USFK reported 81 sexual assaults in 2001; 65 in 2002; and 86 in 2003.

Officials noted that the definitions of sexual assault during these years were NOT standardized throughout the services. Until there is ONE definition, there can NOT be equality in the handling of these problems under the Unified Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Institutional Bias Because of USFK's Male-oriented Hierarchy It is sad, but there has ALWAYS been an institutional bias in the military against the female involved in a sexual assault -- reflecting much the same attitudes as the civilian police in some areas. Though things are much better than the "old days," the military remains primarily a male environment -- with females in a support role. Females are pilots of F-16s assigned to Kunsan AB, but what happens when the REAL WAR breaks out. Regardless that they have the tenacity of a fighter jock with superior skills, can they fly combat LEGALLY? That STILL has not been answered by the United States Congress -- and as such the U.S. military STILL remains a male-dominated hierarchy. Like it or not, it is reality.

As such the mindset of the military in Korea remains biased towards the male and intensified because of the REAL combat environment potential. Feminists will puke at this idea, but look around at the leadership charts of any base/camp/unit in Korea. On the USFK bases, the key leaders for the fighting forces who are generals, colonels, chief enlisted are men, while the women who are colonels, chief enlisted are leaders in support unit roles. It is a fact of life that is driven by that legality which has been left unanswered by the US Congress of women's role in combat.

This male mindset spills over into the area of sexual interrelationships. The military cannot deny that there exists an environment where its soldiers of both sexes are sexually active. The female soldier from the Abu Grahb prison scandal being pregnant by her soldier boyfriend -- and splashed in headlines around the world -- attests to this fact. We also believe when you lock down the availability of these off-base "girlfriends" for the GIs, there will be an increase in fraternization between officer-enlisted and superior-subordinate.

USFK Coed Dormitory Policy Adds to Problem Some may think that we are old-fashioned, but the military with their new "coed dormitories" needs to reconsider the old 1960s, female only floors. In Korea, new facilities are now being built in Korea that will ensure that all GIs can be housed on base -- and the reduction in forces ensures that rooms will be available. Perhaps the return of the male and female dorm floors should be considered to eliminate much of the problems. Males would be allowed only in the common areas. It is a FACT that almost half of sexual assault offenses occur in barracks. The majority of alleged victims are junior enlisted and the majority of alleged perpetrators are junior enlisted or NCOs. Thus the intermingling in coed dorms is just inviting trouble.

3 Nov 2005: Osan AB -- Senior Airman Jason A. Meier of the 51st Aircraft Maintenance Squadron is charged with indecent assault and unlawful entry of her room. The airman has pleaded not guilty to the charges. According to the prosecution, the actions leading to the charges occurred in the early hours of June 19 at Osan Air Base. The unlawful entry charge arose from the accusation that Meiers entered the woman's room and the indecent assault charge came from the accusation that he removed some of her clothing and touched her genital region. According to the prosecution, when the woman awoke, Meier was lying next to her with his arm around her. Meador said the two had seen each other on base but were not acquaintances. When the woman turned on the light, according to the prosecution, she recognized Meier.
But -- gasp! -- what if two consenting individuals want sex? Get a motel room downtown!

USFK Environment Fosters Sexual Assaults The USFK has to realize that it operates in a "high testosterone" area -- WARRIOR COUNTRY, the TIP OF THE SPEAR, etc. etc. etc. Korea trains as the macho "soldiers/airmen" who are going to "take the fight north." Phrases like "laying my life on the line" are commonly heard. These US "soldiers/airmen" practice their live-or-die tactics and warriors with all the mental he-man images that produces. This is the environment that these individuals live in 24-hours a day. They practice in exercises for the REAL eventuality of a REAL enemy that is across the border who is constantly screaming how it will turn Seoul into a city of flames and crush the USFK. Their exercises are for a REAL purpose -- and they are as close to combat as you can be without getting your head blown off.

To place the Korean environment in perspective, in Korea people perform exercises to perfect war fighting skills against a known enemy with SCUDS pointed at them, while the rest of the peacetime world performs exercises to judge one's capability to fight a war IF tasked to go to some unknown location. In Korea, it is real -- in the rest of the peacetime world, it is hypothetical.

Then when the exercises are done, what does the USFK offer these men? Church services and ice cream at the USO for those Christian soldiers. However, for those of another mindset, they look for sexual relief or as a minimum macho-man alcoholic oblivion. The Officer/NCO/Enlisted clubs suffice for alcoholic oblivion, though you feel restrained from screaming "F _ _ K the (enter whatever)" at the top of your lungs because superiors don't like that behavior. The men go downtown to look for some "female companionship" and others get pleasantly wasted.

USFK Morality Campaign: Zero-tolerance Policy on Prostitution Plays a Role in Sexual Assaults We have stated in the article above when Kunsan placed A-town (the GI bar row) off-limits in 2001, on-base assaults and rapes sky-rocketed. Then in 2003, the base did the same action and again, it sky-rocketed. Now in 2005, the situation is USFK wide and we are CERTAIN that the trend is happening USFK wide. We do not have any statistics, but why else would the Command Sergeant Major of the USFK go onto AFN (Korea) and repeatedly make the point of Sexual Assaults -- and institute a drinking age increase to PREVENT sexual assaults (as ridiculous as it seems to us). These tell us that there IS a REAL problem. The only problem is that the USFK do not realize that it is of their own making.

But what if downtown is off-limits? The alcoholics skulk over to the club and complain at the bar over the gates being locked down. Unfortunately, for sexual predators, it is another story. With off-limits sanctions in place, there is only one place to turn to look for sexual relief. They turned their sights inward -- and the problem became a nightmare. We use the analogy, that they locked up the wolves with the sheep in the same cage. The sexual predators and innocent lambs are locked up in the base/camp -- and the sexual predator has no where else to go for selection of his victim.

The USFK needs to realize that it is part of the problem -- BEFORE it can seek a solution.

The military cannot dispute that sexual assaults are highest in overseas areas -- and the PACAF area has the highest rate -- with Korea at the top. In 2002, PACAF accounted for one quarter of all rapes in the military -- and one-third of that number was in Korea. Rapes amongst soldiers -- officers and enlisted -- continues unabated. The military also cannot deny that there still is a prejudice on females claiming sexual assaults -- resulting in many not reporting the incidents.

The latest studies prove that the military needs "remedial" training in this area -- and the USFK has "education programs" on-going to educate the soldiers on sexual harassment. Unfortunately, when they did a followup in 2005, this USFK "education program" was still in work -- not in practice.

We also knew that the current USFK mindset -- using the US Army's 2004 Sexual Assault Report findings -- would blame the on-base assaults on alcohol and age. The report itself said its findings were "inconclusive" because of the lack of empirical data. The USFK simplistic answer to the sexual assault problem is to raise the drinking age and broadcast warnings of the problem without looking at the root causes.

The USFK needs to seriously take another look at itself...either that or move out of Korea. The environment breeds assaults -- and the USFK's present morality campaign is only going to exacerbate the situation.


OPINION: REPORTING OF SEXUAL ASSAULTS

Reporting of Sexual Assaults: We feel that there needs to be an advocate appointed to represent the woman -- with COMPLETE anonymity guaranteed. We feel that an impartial -- if necessary civilian legal expert -- who can investigate the criminal charges that are involved. The key is that the determination be made outside of the chain of command. In the past, this is where the system has failed because command judgment has varied from commander to commander.

In most cases, after a sexual assault, the female will undergo feelings of violation, degradation, defilement, lack of self-worth and a slew of mental conditions that could result in permanent psychosis if left untreated. Females state that they question whether they were at fault -- as though somehow they "deserved" or "attracted" the assault. At the first sign, these women need medical and psychological help by TRAINED personnel. But the real problem is getting the women to report the situation in the first place. Feeling as they do, they are predisposed NOT to report the act.

The new DoD policy in 2005 to guarantee anonymity may help, but it is not the complete answer. The word needs to be gotten to all military females about these types of situations that may occur to them. If they go through a twenty year career and it never happened to them, they will have been a lucky one. In our opinion, women sent to remote tours or isolated assignments have targets painted on their backs that they are potential victims for sexual predators in the units. The women need to know the ugly truth about the military. Once warned, they are no longer the potential victim -- but only one if they allow themselves to be trapped. But they also need to know what to do if this sad situation happens to them.

Our opinion, as shown by the 2004 US Army Sexual Assault Survey, is that this is an area that male leaders do NOT want to talk about. Worse yet, there are still males in leadership roles that also think that somehow if the female got drunk, she contributed partially to the situation. During the initial investigative stages, many commanders appear to simply drop the ball to try to sweep the uncomfortable matter under the carpet. Though there are checklists to handle these situations, there is a judgment call on the part of the superior whether to believe the report from the female because of the consequences to the male member of the assault. We truly believe the decision process for whether the matter should go further needs to be in the hands of an impartial authority. But who should this investigator be? We feel that it should be a JAG -- who can see the legal aspects and is trained to listen to people's cases -- and are especially trained to be impartial and removed from the situation.

Because of the serious nature of the crime, immediate verification of the facts -- and if necessary, mandatory interrogations of suspects by OSI -- but only AFTER there is sufficent evidence (or even suspicion though unsubstantiated) by the independent investigator that such an investigation is warranted. Commanders cannot NOT impartial in this type of situation -- though they try to be -- that calls into play their personal/ethnic/religious/moral backgrounds on the subject. Each brings a different outlook to the situation.

We feel that under current policy, the commanders of various units are "forced" to punish a male individual simply because an allegation has been made -- whether there are extenuating circumstances or not -- or if there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Recent surveys point out with pride that commanders are doing this -- but it simply came out as a statement that commanders were "forced" to impose punishment simply because it was a Command Special Interest Item -- and they would have to answer a report to their action. There are times when no action is the best action.

In March 2005, the DoD announced a new sexual assault reporting policy that allows victims to notify authorities of the attack and receive medical treatment without automatically triggering an official military investigation. (See New Policy on Sexual Assault Reporting.) However, our gut reaction when Dr. Chu of the DoD Human Resources calls it a major step is that it simply is a "cover your ass" move. We agree that sexual assaults are under-reported, but the guarantee of anonymity is only one piece of the puzzle. The "victim" may not be the woman -- but instead the male participant.

Unfortunately this closeness does not always translate into buddies taking care of each other. Sometimes the "buddies" turn out to be sexual predators. As such these supposedly "trusted male friends" took advantage of a situation -- sometimes where their female "buddy" is passed out. How does one report a "trusted friend"? How does one go about preserving one's own position on the team, while destroying another's reputation and position? How does one rip apart a "family" of which you are a part? These are the special questions that apply in Korea to the special relationships and bonds grown within unit camaraderie.

But the best solution to us is to simply attempt to prevent the situation from occurring in the first place. We think an added element needs to be added in the initial inbrief. Women should be made aware that there are some nasty characters in the military and a lot of them are in Korea. These are characters who are not looking out for their best interests. Be part of the team ON-DUTY, but this doesn't mean trusting your safety to just anyone on the team OFF-DUTY. The "buddy system" that commands seem to be pushing of sticking out with your unit -- partying with your unit -- and living with your unit -- is good for commanders, but it doesn't guarantee that your "buddy from work" can be trusted. Be selective and present the facts to them bluntly and coldly. These women deserve to be told the facts -- whether it is a black eye to the unit or not. They may be the next statistic.

Another reported problem is that some females were assaulted while intoxicated. After falling asleep in a drunken stupor, some have woken up with men atop them. These were usually their trusted "friends" who were with them in their rooms when they passed out. In these cases, some women feel reluctant to report the incident because they were underage at the time and would result in disciplinary action. Though this may seem silly to some, it is a weighted factor when some females consider reporting the incident. Women feel the burden of proof is upon them to substantiate the rape -- or atleast prove that they did not contribute in some way to their own misfortune.


USAF/PACAF SEXUAL ASSAULT/CONDUCT ISSUES:

Privacy Issues Under Supreme Court Rulings (2003):

However, the USAF is treading lightly in this touchy area of off-duty sexual activity as the idea of "private sex" was interpreted by the Supreme Court in June 2003 as simply that -- "private." The military argued that it needed to be able to prosecute for sodomy -- oral and anal sex -- between any two partners whether same sex or even married -- in order to maintain discipline and order. The Supreme Court ruling overturned the conviction of a gay USAF TSgt saying that the military could not make private sexual conduct a crime. This case dealt with gays, but other rulings are pending on cases dealing with "sodomy" (oral-anal sex) between heterosexual individuals and adultery. However, these cases involve in-service members and NOT off-base private consensual sex with prostitutes. Dependent on the outcomes, challenges may be made to convictions for off-base "crimes" for consorting with prostitutes.

An 8 Oct UPI article in Military.com stated that the military appeals court could strip the anti-sodomy laws from the UCMJ based upon this decision and extend the privacy protections mandated by the U.S. Supreme Court in June to the sex lives of military personnel. At least two other cases are moving forward that challenge the military sodomy law, both of which involve heterosexual sodomy as well as adultery. The Supreme Court released its historic decision in June in Lawrence v. Texas, striking down anti-sodomy laws in Texas and 12 other states. The case involved the conviction of gay USAF TSgt Eric Marcum for consensual sodomy three years ago. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison but has since been released on parole.

In the article it stated, "In Lawrence, the Supreme Court said private sexual conduct is just that: private. "The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court's majority. "The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime." "We'll grant you have a compelling interest (in good order and discipline). But that doesn't relieve the military of explaining why or how making certain private sexual acts a crime," Essex said."

The article stated that an independent commission on military justice recommended to the Pentagon in 2001 that it strip the anti-sodomy and anti-rape regulations from the Universal Code of Military Justice and replace it with a general moral penal code. "(T)he well-known fact that most adulterous or sodomitical acts ... are not prosecuted creates a powerful perception that prosecution of this sexual behavior is arbitrary and vindictive," the Cox Commission wrote in 2001. The Pentagon has not acted on the recommendation.

The article went on to state that at least two other cases are moving forward that challenge the military sodomy law, both of which involve heterosexual sodomy as well as adultery: United States v. Edwin J. Christian, now before the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals and United States v. Private (E2) Anthonynoel S. Meno, currently before the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals. The military is expected to argue that it needs to be able to prosecute for sodomy -- oral and anal sex -- between any two partners whether same sex or even married -- to maintain order.
Though the Lawrence ruling dealt with homosexuals, it has far reaching impacts on the U.S. military policy on consentual sex between heterosexuals as well. In a Washington Post article Sodomy Ruling Spurs Challenges To Military's Policy on Gays on 4 Aug, it stated,

The first aftershocks of the Supreme Court's landmark decision striking down a Texas sodomy law have reached the U.S. military, where the ruling is sparking new court challenges to the armed forces' ban on openly gay personnel and other rules affecting sexuality. ... In Lawrence, the court ruled that the Texas sodomy law was unconstitutional because the restrictions it placed on liberty "furthered no legitimate state interest." It was one of the rare cases in which the court has found that a statute could not meet that minimal constitutional standard. ... But Loomis is also challenging the military's sodomy statute, known as Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, as a violation of Lawrence. Article 125 prohibits "unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal." Though rarely enforced, Article 125 has been used to court-martial soldiers for consensual acts, both homosexual and heterosexual. ... "The Article 125 case is a better case," said Matt Coles, director of the gay rights project of the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites). "The question for the military is a tough one: 'What interest do you have in regulating private consensual activity?' " ...

In a separate case, Army Pvt. Anthonynoel Meno was recently given a bad-conduct discharge and reduction in pay for allegedly engaging in consensual sodomy with a female soldier. His appeal was rejected by the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals, but after the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Lawrence, Lt. Col. Robert D. Teetsel, the chief of the Army defense counsel appellate division, asked the court to reconsider the case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the highest military appeals court, upheld Article 125 in a case of consensual heterosexual oral sex in 1992, citing Bowers. Because of Lawrence, that court may ultimately have to revisit the question, Teetsel said, adding that among military defense lawyers, "we're all jostling in the different services to get a case to them." In a sign that the Defense Department itself may question the viability of Article 125, Pentagon general counsel Charles Haynes has instructed the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice, a body of military lawyers known as judge advocates general, to review Article 125 in light of Lawrence, a Pentagon official said. The review, to be completed by the end of the year, could result in recommendations to Congress for changes in the law, the official said.

On July 9, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) proposed a bill that would amend Article 125 to decriminalize consensual sexual activity between adults.

PACAF Orders Commanders to Improve Rape/Assault Services (March 2004)

We believe the reason for the censorship at Kunsan AB dealing with sexual assaults/rapes and off-base A-town incidents is that in Feb 2004, the DoD ordered a review of policies on how sexual-assault victims were treated. According to a Stars & Stripes article on 8 Feb 2004, "Concern over recent media reports of sexual misconduct among troops in combat zones has prompted the Pentagon to launch an investigation into the way sexual assault victims are treated. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld signed a memo Thursday directing David Chu, the undersecretary for Personnel and Readiness, to review the department's policy and position on sexual assault and how victims are cared for. .. "I am concerned about recent reports regarding allegations of sexual assaults on servicemembers deployed to Iraq and Kuwait," Rumsfeld wrote. "Sexual assault will not be tolerated in the Department of Defense."

The genesis of Rumsfeld's concern is an in-depth Jan. 25 Denver Post article that reported 37 female servicemembers sought counseling and other help from civilian rape crisis organizations after returning from war duty from the theater, a defense official said. The article continued, "The women, ranging from enlisted soldiers to officers, have reported poor medical treatment, lack of counseling and incomplete criminal investigations by military officials. Some say they were threatened with punishment after reporting assaults," according to the Post article.

The article went on, "I am directing that you review how the department handles treatment of and care for victims of sexual assault, with particular attention to any special issues that may arise from the circumstances of a combat theater," Rumsfeld wrote. "We are responsible for ensuring that the victims of sexual assault are properly treated, their medical and psychological needs are properly met, our policies and programs are effective, and we are prompt in dealing with all issues involved."

Rumsfeld has asked for the review of sexual assault policies and the victim support network throughout the DoD. He asked for a report by the beginning of May. The inquiry was prompted by stories in The Denver Post that thousands of sex offenders in the military had escaped punishment and numerous women's claims of sexual assault and rape were dismissed or mishandled by commanders.

To counter the bad press from this issue, the military announced in Feb 2004 that sexual assaults in the military have been cut in half in recent years. This was in response to criticism from lawmakers who say the Defense Department is not doing enough to address the issue. David Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel readiness, said new figures show the rate of sexual assaults against women in the military fell from 6 percent to 3 percent between 1995 and 2002. According to Stars and Stripes on 26 Feb, "Chu unveiled results of the "Armed Forces 2002 Sexual Harassment Survey," which reflects a decrease in reports of sexual assaults by women from 6 percent in 1995 to 3 percent in 2002, the last dates for which survey were done. Despite this, Sen. John Warner, R-Va., criticized him for taking two years to issue the report. "Why would it take two years to [release] the survey," Warner boomed, waving a copy. "It should have been addressed long before two years."

But Chu also admitted that the U.S. military has fallen short in providing victims of sexual assault — particularly those in combat zones — the medical and counseling care they need. "Right now, our principal focus of review is how we care for the victims. … We need to improve care to the victims," Chu told members of the Personnel Subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "We believe this is where we have the greatest distance to go."

In his visit to Kunsan AB on March 1-2, Lt. Gen. Garry Trexler, 7th AF Commander said there are things to be aware of in the increase in sexual assaults throughout the military. "Drink responsibly. People need to look after each other, and when it does happen, we need to take care of the victim. ... Both Kunsan and Osan have very active programs inplace and until there are zero, we are not going to be pleased."

But PACAF is now aware that all the programs are not enough. The following article is from the Stars and Stripes on 14 March 2004:

Study generates order to commanders to improve services to rape victims

By Nancy Montgomery and Joseph Giordono, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Saturday, March 13, 2004

PACAF sex-assault review shows 7 percent conviction rate

Of 106 suspects cited in the Pacific Air Forces sex assault study, 14 were tried by court-martial and seven were convicted of rape and sentenced to an average eight years in prison. Three suspects were discharged, and two of those cases have yet to be adjudicated. That's a 7 percent conviction rate, less than half the 18 percent civilian conviction rate cited in the report.

But Lt. Col. Steven J. Lepper, PACAF's top lawyer and leader of the study, said the review panel believed commanders did aggressively pursue rape cases because all reports were investigated and because of the number of cases — more than 40 — in which accused servicemembers were punished for lesser charges more easily proved, such as adultery. They were given such punishment as demotions, pay forfeitures or letters of reprimand.

"Where we couldn't prove the rape, the commanders did hold them accountable for misconduct they could prove," he said.

No action was taken against 28 others because of lack of evidence, the survey found, and 19 other cases are pending.

"The 'take away' message … is that while commanders charged only 12 subjects with rape, over 50 percent of subjects were held accountable to some extent for misconduct revealed during the course of the rape investigation," according to a slide presentation of the report.

But the report also noted that "there are legitimate reasons why commanders might be more conservative than civilian district attorneys: distraction from the mission, significant investments of manpower, and personnel consequences to subjects during the delay before trial that are not present in the civilian community."

In most of the PACAF cases, the victims were not injured and there were no witnesses, Lepper said.

Suspects, usually close in age and rank to the victim, usually said the sex was consensual, and sometimes the victims were unclear what had happened because of the alcohol they'd consumed, he said.

"In some cases the victim didn't even remember the specifics of the act that occurred," Lepper said. Although the PACAF review did not include interviews of victims, Lepper said researchers concluded that alleged victims did not face pressure to keep silent and soldier on.

Lepper said this conclusion was based on the fact that the number of cases reviewers looked at and, based on the evidence, thought should have gone to court-martial matched the number that were so referred.

One woman who reported a rape ended up being punished herself for rules violations: a lieutenant who had gone drinking and dancing with a sergeant, whom she said later raped her. She was reprimanded for fraternization, while the sergeant, who said the sex was consensual, was not prosecuted for rape.

"The additional fact is that she was married to someone else," Lepper said. "What we suspect is she felt badly about having had sex and reported it as a rape." Asked why a married woman would call more attention to adulterous sex, including being cross-examined at court-martial, instead of maintaining a discreet silence, Lepper said he didn't know, and couldn't know for sure whether she had in fact been raped, but that there was not enough evidence for prosecution.

Flaws to correct

The PACAF review found flaws in how records were kept, how victims were treated and how investigations were conducted, and PACAF commander Gen. William J. Begert ordered immediate changes in those areas.

Among them:

  • In more than a third of the cases, no forensic test of the victim for DNA evidence was done, because the suspect maintained he'd had consensual sex with the victim. Begert ordered a forensic test now be done in all cases.

  • • In cases not prosecuted, there was often no record on what analysis went into such decisions. Now military lawyers must provide written assessments of the case, and commanders' decisions on whether a case goes forward will be filed with those reports.

  • In most cases, there was no indication that women had been provided with a victim liaison. Now one must be provided immediately, must serve as an advocate to help the victim, and must continue to provide services even if the case is not prosecuted.

  • • Only 16 suspects were given a polygraph. While polygraph results are not admissible in court, investigators say suspects sometimes confess when confronted with results indicating deception. Polygraphs can be performed only when a suspect agrees to one.

— Nancy Montgomery

Commanders throughout the Pacific Air Forces have been ordered to immediately begin providing better services to rape victims, perform more thorough investigations, and keep better records of sexual assaults following a five-month review that found 92 reports of rape from 2001 to 2003 and flaws in how the cases were handled.

The review was ordered in September by Gen. William J. Begert, Pacific Air Forces commander, to learn about the prevalence of rapes and how they were dealt with on his bases in Guam, South Korea, Japan, Okinawa, Hawaii, Alaska, Singapore and Diego Garcia. The general's concern was a result of last year's rape scandal at the Air Force Academy.

In interviews this week, officials at several bases touted extensive programs either already in place or under consideration. From banning alcohol in common dorm areas at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, to a required 20-minute video presentation at Kunsan Air Base, South Korea, the measures vary widely.

South Korea

The PACAF report found more than one-third of the cases were reported at air bases in South Korea, home to about one-quarter of the command. Leaders at Osan and Kunsan say they have aggressive plans that either existed before Begert's review or have been implemented shortly after.

At Kunsan, a Sexual Assault Fact and Education Program (SAFE) has been in place since May 2003 and "meets or exceeds" the new PACAF guidelines, according to 8th Fighter Wing commander Col. Robin Rand.

Col. Bill Coutts, wing vice commander and head of a sexual assault prevention task force, said the effort includes representatives from the Office of Special Investigations, the judge advocate general's office, Life Skills and medical personnel, the chaplains' office and base security. Most of the measures have been established since August, he said, when the command decided to beef up the SAFE program.

"The very first day our people come in, as soon as they get off the plane, they get a mission brief that emphasizes the policy toward preventing and deterring sexual assaults," Coutts said. Every incoming airman watches as part of their in-processing a locally produced, 20-minute video on sexual harassment and assault.

Younger airmen also get targeted briefs from the wing commander, as Kunsan's own internal study showed most cases involved alcohol and airmen between the ages of 18 and 24. Twice a year, squadron commanders hold required sexual assault briefing for airmen, separated by sex to ensure a "completely open" atmosphere, Coutts said.

Rand is also putting an emphasis on removing fear of retribution for reported attacks, Coutts said. Beginning Friday, Rand will hold a series of meetings with senior NCOs, officers, junior enlisted and senior enlisted to emphasize that a zero-tolerance policy is in effect for co-workers or immediate supervisors who try to pressure a potential victim into not filing charges.

The efforts hit "smaller," but not less-important notes, Coutts said. SAFE wallet cards, with information on how to prevent sexual assault as well as phone numbers and evidentiary instructions if an assault occurs, are distributed to all personnel. First names have been removed from dorm room name plates so gender cannot be determined from outside a door.


Some of the measures mirror efforts at Osan Air Base. There, officials have even stressed such simple measures as installing self-locking doors and peepholes in every dorm door so residents can see who is outside.

More broadly, a "Tiger Team" of enlisted leaders, medical personnel, legal officials and security forces has been tasked with reporting new findings and recommendations to the 51st Fighter Wing commander by March 22, said Chief Master Sgt. Jerry Sutton, the wing's senior enlisted advisor.

Existing measures include a 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. "Wing Man" policy, which requires all soldiers to be accompanied when out of their dorms. Squadron commanders are authorized to require senior enlisted or officer presence in dorms on the weekends. The largest squadron on the base, the 51st Maintenance Group, also has that policy in effect, Sutton said.

The command also will put more emphasis on having front-line leaders watch younger airmen. Beginning this weekend, chief master sergeants will be in on- and off-post clubs to show a presence, Sutton said. A victim advocacy program is in place.

Japan

The 35th Fighter Wing staff judge advocate at Misawa Air Base, Japan, said officials there had formed a group several months ago to start looking at the issue of sexual assault.

"We actually had something called a 'special interest item' the inspector general had been working on," said Lt. Col. Eric Bee. "I mean, sexual assault is not new, the Air Force Academy has been percolating for awhile, the SJAs have been … looking at it, the inspector general has been looking at it."

Bee said the group met the day before Begert sent out his directives.

"As we talked through the issues of sexual assault, we actually came up with an awful lot of those types of things," Bee said of Begert's action items. "It's not rocket science. What do you need to do? You need to take care of the victim … you need to make sure everyone is talking to each other on the base."

Bee said Misawa has good programs.

"The thing that Gen. Begert's action plan is going to do for us is put those together," Bee said of the individual programs, and make the process "a seamless approach."

Bee said the working group found two main areas where they thought the base could improve: the first, prevention/education; the second, forming a holistic "seamless" approach to getting all the agencies involved.

Bee said all airmen arriving at Misawa are briefed on sexual assault during in-processing. He said the base is studying separating the males and females for that briefing.

He said commanders are looking at the dorms' alcohol policies but have made no changes.

Yokota Air Base doesn't provide a shelter for alleged victims of sexual assault, officials said, but the 374th Airlift Wing appoints a victim liaison after an incident is reported. That individual is appointed by the staff judge advocate under the provisions of the Victim Witness Assistance Program.

The liaison, normally a judge advocate or paralegal, helps alleged victims access base services such as medical treatment, Family Advocacy, and the Air Force Aid Society's Financial Assistance Program. Officials said that person also obtains information related to any investigation and the military justice process.

Okinawa and Guam

At Kadena Air Base on Okinawa, every newcomer receives at least one of two briefs on the issue. The 18th Air Wing Commander addresses the issue at the weekly newcomers' briefing and Office of Special Investigations agents brief every First Term Airman's Center class, said spokesman Charles Steitz.

The OSI brief covers specifics such as the legal definition of rape/sexual assault; contributing factors typically seen, especially alcohol; when and how to report incidents; and how to avoid getting into dangerous situations.

"This training also addresses the fact that the lack of express consent can constitute sexual assault," Steitz said. "This is especially [emphasized] with regard to situations where a person may be unable to consent because of alcohol use."

Kadena is the only overseas PACAF base to bar alcohol in common areas of dorms. Several other bases said they were considering that policy. Kunsan rescinded such a policy recently, after its own sexual assault survey indicated most cases involved off-base or base-club drinking.

Kadena also has victim liaisons on hand. Normally a military judge advocate or paralegal, the liaisons are appointed through the Victim Witness Assistance Program to help the victim access everything from medical treatment to the Air Force Aid Society Financial Assistance Program, Steitz said.

Kadena also has establishment of a Joint Services Family Shelter — one of only two in the entire Department of Defense, they say — which provides 24-hour services and shelter to victims.

At Andersen Air Base on Guam, officials will hold a meeting Monday with "all the key base agencies involved, to discuss how to implement the action items," said Maj. Kristina Meyle, chief of public affairs.

While the base does not currently have training or education programs specifically tailored to address sexual assaults, family advocacy provides sexual assault briefings geared toward new commanders.

Those briefings, which are part of a larger domestic violence briefing, are mandatory for new unit commanders, Meyle said.

Andersen does have 36th Air Expeditionary Wing active-duty members and DOD contractors assigned to Life Skills and who work sexual assault response programs with trained social workers. Andersen, because it is on Guam, also has more of the traditional community resources found near stateside bases.

Cause for review

The Air Force Academy cases focused attention on the problem and spurred Begert's review, officials said. Women cadets there reported being raped and intimidated by upperclassmen and said they were punished for rules infractions if they reported an assault, while their attackers often went unpunished.

"After the academy stories arose, he (Begert) wanted to get a better sense of the nature of the issue in PACAF," Lt. Col. Steven J. Lepper, the command's top lawyer and study leader, said by phone from Hawaii. "It started very small but grew as we got further and further into the data, he had more and more questions."

Lepper said the vast majority of reported rapes were "acquaintance rapes," in which both people knew each other. "The resulting message to our young men and women is that even people they trust can sometimes take advantage of them," the report said.

On top of local bases following Begert's orders, Lepper said the Air Force Command also wants airmen to watch out for drunken colleagues, much as designated drivers do to prevent DUIs. He calls them "designated thinkers," and wants them to ensure that women airmen who've had too much to drink are safe. "That they're tucked in and locked in so that no one can hurt them," Lepper said.


— T.D. Flack, Sid Acker, Vince Little and Fred Zimmerman contributed to this report.

The following article appeared in the Stars and Stripes on 3 Apr 2004:

Sex assault investigators visit PACAF bases to check for improvements

By Nancy Montgomery, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Friday, April 2, 2004

Four investigative teams were meeting with wing commanders and airmen throughout the Pacific this week in a follow-up to the Pacific Air Forces survey to see how commands are dealing with sexual assault and how to improve both prevention and response.

Four three-person teams, each led by a colonel and including an Air Force lawyer and medical professional, are visiting wings in Alaska, Japan, Hawaii, South Korea and Guam. Each visit is to last about four days, officials said.

“We’re trying to get a better handle on the problem,” said Col. Steve Lepper, the Pacific Air Command staff judge advocate who headed the September study that analyzed 92 reported rapes in PACAF.

The teams not only will “look at how programs are working, but also go a step farther and get perceptions from airmen on the issue of sex assault,” he said. “We’ll talk to people who live in the dorms and have a more grass-roots perspective and also see how they feel leadership is stepping up to this issue.”

The study Lepper headed was initiated by Gen. William Begert, who commands the Pacific Air Forces, in the wake of the sexual assault scandal at the Air Force Academy. Bergert wanted to know how prevalent sexual assault was in his command, whether offenders were appropriately punished and how victims were treated.

The study found that most of the assaults were non-injury “acquaintance rapes,” and that in many cases alcohol was a factor. The study also found flaws in how the cases were handled, prompting orders to ensure victim advocates were appointed, more complete evidence was gathered and cases were better documented, including a legal analysis of each. The study brought about a servicewide investigation, including instructions for each command to send out teams to gather information.


“So now we’ve really in effect come full circle,” Lepper said in a phone interview. “We are now taking action that was initiated based on the action we took.”

Victims would not be interviewed during the short visits, Lepper said. “We were advised by folks better acquainted with post-traumatic stress that the burdens and disadvantages of re-traumatizing victims might outweigh the benefits,” he said. “We knew pretty much where our weaknesses were.”

In February, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ordered a Department of Defense-wide review of how sex assault victims are treated. The order followed questions from Congress and news reports that after returning to the United States, at least 37 female soldiers in Iraq sought help from civilian organizations for sexual trauma. Those women reported poor medical services and inadequate investigations by commanders. Rumsfeld ordered the review be completed by May.

Next month at a PACAF commanders’ conference, Lepper said, the group will meet with Christine Hansen, executive director of the Miles Foundation, a Connecticut-based group to help victims of military sexual assault and domestic violence and a critic of how the military has dealt with such issues.

“We want to learn,” Lepper said. “We know we’re only starting to understand the dynamics of sexual assault and how to respond. We’re thirsty for whatever information we can get. We’re starting with commanders. We believe this is a leadership issue.”

In June 2004, the USFK instituted a Sexual Harassment survey on the EUSA intranet. The survey hoped a minimum of 2,000 respondents to validate the survey. The survey closed out on 30 June.


Army Policy on Sexual Assault (May 2004)

The The Army Policy on Sexual Assault in May 2004 has finally standardized the definition of "sexual assault" which before could be interpreted as simply touching another member on the arm in an unwanted manner. It was ambiguous and impeded prosecution. The current definition limits the definition to "offenses of rape, forcible sodomy, and indecent assault."

The findings centered on five key areas: 1) policy, program, proponent, and integration; 2) education, prevention, training, communication, and command climate; 3) incident response, investigation, and action taken; 4) victim services; 5) data collection, reporting, evaluation, and program improvement. Findings are—
    ·
  • Current sexual assault prevention and response policies and programs are not integrated among supporting organizations. ·
  • Privileged and confidential avenues of communication exist; however, they are not widely recognized throughout the Army as confidential avenues for victims of sexual assault. ·
  • Current human relations training programs include prevention of sexual harassment but only address sexual assault prevention and response to a limited extent. ·
  • Response and actions taken when a sexual assault is reported vary among commanders. (Army regulations require that all serious crimes be reported to CID. Although CID receives reports on incidents of rape and forcible sodomy, less severe forms of indecent assaults were often inve